Full Text Transcript (Pages 1–50 of 61)
CCCCCHHHHHAAAAAPPPPPTTTTTEEEEERRRRR ––––– 55555
INDIAN
ECONOMY –
A PROFILE
Unit 1
Nature
of
Indian
Economy
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Learning Objectives
At the end of this unit, you will be able to :
(cid:2) know about the criteria of classifying an economy as underdeveloped, developing or
developed.
(cid:2) understand the factors which make Indian economy as underdeveloped.
(cid:2) understand the factors which make Indian economy as developing.
(cid:2) understand how Indian economy can be classified as mixed economy.
1.0 INDIA - AN UNDEVELOPED ECONOMY
1.0.0. Features of an Underdeveloped Economy : Generally an economy is said to be
underdeveloped, if it has the following characteristics:
(cid:3) Agriculture is the main occupation of the people. Nearly 60 to 80 per cent of the population
is engaged in agriculture and its related activities.
(cid:3) Poverty is wide-spread. The ability to save of people is very low. Due to the low rate of
saving, the rate of capital formation/investment is very low.
(cid:3) Population grows at a high rate (about 2 per cent per annum) and the burden of dependent
population is also high.
(cid:3) The standard of living of people is generally low and the productivity of labour is also
considerably low.
(cid:3) The production techniques are backward. Investment in research and development is
quite low.
(cid:3) The incidence of unemployment and underemployment is quite high.
(cid:3) The level of human well-being measured in terms of real income, health and education is
generally low.
(cid:3) Income inequalities are widespread.
(cid:3) Apart from the above features, such economies have low participation in foreign trade,
their social life is traditional; people are generally orthodox in their outlook and they seldom
make any changes in their socio-economic relations.
1.0.1 India's case: If we analyze Indian economy we may say that it is an undeveloped
economy. This is because it has most of the characteristics mentioned above.
i) Agriculture is the main occupation of the people in India. At the time of Independence
nearly 72 per cent of the population was dependent on agriculture. At present, nearly 52
per cent population is dependent on agriculture (2008-09). There has been an increase in
the absolute number of people engaged in agricultural activities in India.
208 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
ii) In India, the incidence of poverty is very high. Every third poor person in the world is an
Indian. That means one third of the world's poor live in India. According to the latest
available data (results of the latest round of the National Sample Survey Organization
(NSSO) - 2004-05) nearly 22 per cent of the population is below poverty line. The
corresponding ratio was 36 per cent in 1993-94 and 26 per cent in 1999-2000.
iii) Over the years, Indian population has grown at a fast rate of more than 2 per cent. The
country is facing the problem of population explosion as the death rate is falling but there
is no corresponding fall in the birth rate. The dependency rate i.e. percentage of people in
non-working age group (below 15 and above 64 years of age) is nearly 40 per cent in India
as compared to developed countries where it is about 33 per cent.
iv) India's per capita income was $950 in 2007. It is low not only compared to developed
countries like USA, UK, Germany but also developing countries like China, Sri Lanka,
Indonesia etc. Because of low level of per capita, income the standard of living of people is
quite low.
v) In India, because of low per capita income and low saving rates, the gross capital formation
rates have remained considerably low. Gross domestic savings were generally below 20
per cent of GDP (at current prices) between 1950-1990. As a result, gross domestic capital
formation has also remained below 20 per cent during these years. Consequently, the rate
of economic growth has remained stuck at a relatively low level. Since 1990-91, there
have been improvements in saving and investment rates. Beginning with around 23 per
cent in 1990-91 the gross domestic savings rate reached 29.8 per cent in 2003-04 and
became 37.7 per cent in 2007-08; similarly gross domestic capital formation became 36.9 per
cent in 2006-07 and 39.1 per cent in 2007-08 starting from 26 per cent in 1990-91.
vi) Techniques of production, especially in the agriculture sector are still backward.
Productivity in agriculture as well as in industrial sector is low in India as compared to
advanced countries.
vii) The incidence of unemployment in India is quite high. The Tenth Plan aimed to create
approximately 50 million employment opportunities during the plan period. The results of the
61st NSSO round show that about 47 million persons were provided job during 2000-05. Thus,
we find that there are a large number of unemployed people in India. Not only this, the
unemployment rate over the years has increased. This will be clear from the following
table (NSSO - 55th and 61st Rounds).
GENERAL ECONOMICS 209
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Table 1 : Rate of unemployment (CDS Basis)
(in percentage)
1999-00 2004-05
Rural
Males 7.2 8.0
Females 7.0 8.7
Urban
Males 7.3 7.5
Females 9.4 11.6
Not only there is high rate of open unemployment the rate of disguised unemployment is
also very high. Disguised unemployment means apparently people are employed but their
contribution to the production is very-very low. In other words, their productivity is nil or
negative. Such type of unemployment is more common in the agricultural sector. Here,
many people work in a small farm land but their contribution is almost nil. So they are
disguisedly unemployed. The actual extent of disguised unemployment is difficult to
measure.
viii) In India, the level of human well-being is also quite low. For measuring human well-
being, generally Human Development Index (HDI) constructed by the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) is used. The HDI is a composite of three basic indicators
of human development - longevity, knowledge and standard of living. Longevity is
measured in terms of life expectancy at birth, knowledge in terms of education and standard
of living in terms of real GDP per capita. The HDI is a simple average of the above indices.
The UNDP finds this index for all countries and ranks them. According to the latest UNDP
Report 2008, India's relative global ranking on this index has remained at a low of 132
among 179 countries. Its HDI was 0.577 in 2004 which improved marginally to 0.609 in
2006.
ix) The distribution of income and wealth in India is not equitable. In order to measure the
inequality of income and wealth, generally Gini index is used. The Gini index measures
the extent to which distribution of income/consumption among individuals or households
within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. A Gini index of zero
represents perfect equality while an index of one represents perfect inequality. The Gini
coefficient lies between 0 and 1. According to the World Development Report - 2006, the
Gini index for India in 1999-00 (survey year) was 0.33. It increased to 0.368 in 2004 (Central
Intelligence Agency). The corresponding figure was 0.297 in 1994. Thus, over this period,
the inequalities of income and wealth have increased.
210 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
1.1 INDIA - A DEVELOPING ECONOMY
If we go through the above facts, we may rush to the conclusion that Indian economy is an
underdeveloped economy. But that is not completely true. Indian economy has over the decades
shown marked improvements. It is in fact moving fast on the path of development. The
following facts are important here:
(i) Rise in National income: India's national income i.e. Net National Product (NNP) at factor
cost was Rs. 2,04,924 crore in 1950-51 which rose to Rs. 27,64,795 crore (at constant
prices) in 2007-08. Thus, over a period of 58 years the NNP has increased by more than 12
times. On an average, the NNP has increased at a rate of a little less than 5 per cent per
annum. During the 27 years, NNP rose at a rate of more than 5.5 per cent per annum as
against 3.5 per cent per annum during the first three decades of planning. Thus, we see
that India is growing although at not so high rate of growth.
(ii) Rise in Per Capita Income: Per capita income in India was Rs. 5,708 in 1950-51 (at constant
prices). It rose Rs. 24,295 in 2008-09. Thus, over a period of 57 years, the per capita income
has increased by more than three times. On an average, the per capita income has increased
at a rate of around 2.2 per cent per annum. In fact, in the last 27 there has been a spurt in
the growth rate of per capita income. It rose at an average rate of 3.5 per annum, during
this period compared with 1.4 per cent per annum during the first 30 years of planning.
(iii) Significant changes in occupational distribution of population: By occupational structure of a
country we mean the distribution of work force in different occupations of the country.
All occupations are broadly divided into three groups.
(i) Primary Sector: Primary sector includes agriculture and other activities related with
agriculture such as animal husbandry, forestry, poultry farming etc.
(ii) Secondary sector: This includes all types of manufacturing activities including
construction etc.
(iii) Tertiary sector: This sector includes trade, transport, communication, banking and
other such services.
In general, it has been found that as an economy grows, there is a shift of labour force from
primary sector to secondary and tertiary sectors. The proportion of working population in
agriculture and allied activities falls and the proportion of working population in secondary
sector and tertiary sector rises. This happens basically because of two reasons. Firstly, as
economic development takes place income increases but demand for agricultural goods does
not increase proportionately. On the other hand, rise in incomes brings about a large increase
in demand for goods and services produced by secondary and tertiary sectors. Secondly, as an
economy develops, better techniques of production become available to the agricultural sector
which improve productivity of land and labour in this sector. The result is that there is a less
need for labour in agriculture. On the other hand, although productivity also improves in the
industrial sector, the increase in demand for industrial goods is far greater than the rise in
productivity in this sector. This necessitates engagement of more labour in this sector, hence
the shift takes place.
Occupational structure in India: The following table shows the occupational structure in
India.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 211
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Table 2: Occupational Distribution of Working Population in India
Occupation 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001
Primary sector 72.1 71.8 72.1 68.7 62.7 59.3
Secondary sector 10.6 12.2 11.2 13.5 14.9 18.2
Tertiary sector 17.3 16.0 16.7 17.5 22.4 22.5
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
During 1951, Primary sector offered work to about 72 percent of the working population,
secondary sector to 10.6 percent and tertiary sector to 17.3 percent of the working population.
In 2001 there was some change in the occupational distribution. The primary, secondary and
tertiary sectors respectively occupied 59.3 percent, 18.2 percent and 22.5 percent of the working
population.
According to the Economic Survey 2007-08, around 52.7 per cent of the working population
was engaged in primary sector, 18.8 per cent in secondary sector and 28.5 per cent in tertiary
sector in 2004-05.
Thus, over a period of five and a half decades there has been shift of work force from primary
to secondary and tertiary sectors signifying development in the economy.
(iv) Important changes in sectoral distribution of domestic product: An important indicator which
shows that India is growing is decline in the share of agricultural sector in the overall
gross domestic product. The following table shows how over a period of five and a half
decades, structural changes have taken place in India - the share of agricultural and allied
activities has fallen and shares of secondary (industrial) sector and tertiary (services) sectors
have improved in the GDP.
Table 3 : Composition of GDP
1950-51 1960-61 1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2007-08
Primary 56.1 47.8 42.8 36.5 29.1 26.50 17.0
Secondary 11.7 15.1 16.9 19.5 21.9 23.1 25.8
Tertiary 32.7 37.3 40.9 44.0 49.0 50.4 57.2
National Income statistics, CMIE
(v) Growing capital base of the economy: Another characteristic which hints that the economy is
growing is the development of strong industrial base in the country. At the time of
Independence, we had very few basic and capital goods industries. But after Independence,
especially in the Second Plan a high priority was given to establishing basic industries. As
a result, a large number of industries have been established during the planning period.
These include, iron and steel, heavy chemicals, nitrogenous fertilizers, heavy engineering,
machine tools, locomotives, heavy chemicals, heavy electrical equipment, petroleum
products and many more.
212 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(vi) Improvements in social overhead capital: Social overhead capital mainly includes transport
facilities, irrigation facilities, energy, education system, health and medical facilities. When
there is an expansion in these facilities, we say that the economy is growing. In India,
since Independence, these facilities have improved a lot as can be seen from the following
points.
(cid:3) The railways' route length has increased by nearly 10 thousand kilometers. Indian
railways has been world's third largest rail network under a single management. In
two metro-cities - Kolkata and Delhi, Metro Rail system has been working. This system
has solved the problem of traffic congestion in these cities to a great extent.
(cid:3) Diesel and electrical locomotives have replaced steam engines.
(cid:3) The Indian road network has become one of the largest networks in the world aggregating
3.34 million kilometers.
(cid:3) Although the country is still facing energy crisis, there has been an impressive increase
in the installed capacity. In 2008-09, the installed electricity generating capacity was
1,49,390 MW (Mega Watt) against 2,300 MW in 1950-51. 74,700 MW in 1990-91 and
1,17,800 MW in 2000-01.
(cid:3) Similarly, irrigation facilities have increased raising the land under irrigation from
22.6 million hectares in 1950-51 to 87.2 million-hectares in 2006-07.
(cid:3) In the field of education, during the planning period, the number of primary
educational institutions has more than doubled. The number of higher secondary
educational institutions has increased by 20 times and number of colleges has increased
by around 30 times. The literacy rate has increased from 18.33 per cent in 1951 to
67.6 per cent in 2005-06.
(cid:3) In the field of medicine and health also, some development has taken place. The
number of doctors has increased by more than 9 times increasing from 61.800 in 1951
to around 7 lakh in 2008. The bed-population ratio is now 1.03 per 1,000 population
increasing from .32 per 1,000 in 1950-51.
(vii) Development in the banking and financial sector: Since Independence, important developments
have taken place in the banking and financial sector. Initially banks were under private
ownership. But after Independence, the process of nationalization was started. In 1949
Reserve Bank of India was nationalised and later in 1969 and 1980 many big banks
were nationalised. As a result, banks which earlier catered to very small population have
now reached at every nook and corner. Agricultural sector, small scale industries and
other sectors have been getting bank's funds on a priority basis and at concessional rates
of interest.
Thus, we can say, that although India is economically not so strong economy, but it is on
the road of development. If its present pace of development continues, in the near future
it will become an economic force to reckon with.
1.2 INDIA - A MIXED ECONOMY
In chapter one, we studied different types of economies on the basis of ownership of means of
production. In India, we observe that the following characteristics exist:
(cid:3) Private ownership of means of production - Agriculture and most of the industrial and services
sectors are in the private hands.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 213
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(cid:3) Important role of market mechanism - Market forces of demand and supply have free role in
determining prices in various markets. Government regulations and control over period
of time have reduced a lot.
(cid:3) Growth of monopoly houses - Over a period of time, many big business houses have come
into being and have been growing such as Tatas, Birlas, Reliance, Infosys etc.
(cid:3) Presence of a large public sector along with free enterprise - After Independence, the government
recognised the need to provide infrastructure for the growth of the private sector. Also, it
could not hand over strategic sectors like arms and ammunition, atomic energy, air
transport etc. to the private sector. So public sector was developed on a large scale.
(cid:3) Economic planning as a means of realizing overall national economic goals - Economic planning
has been an integrated part of the Indian Economy. The Planning Commission lays down
overall targets for the economy as a whole, for public sector and even for the sectors
which are in the private hands like agriculture. The government tries to achieve the laid
down targets by providing incentives to these sectors. Thus, here planning is only indicative
in nature and not compulsive.
Observing the above characteristics we conclude that Indian economy is a mixed economy.
SUMMARY
Generally an economy is said to be underdeveloped if agriculture is the main occupation of its
people, population is growing at a high rate, techniques of production are backward, incidences
of unemployment and poverty are high and there are wide-spread income-inequalities and so
on. If we observe Indian economy, we may conclude that Indian economy is undeveloped.
But, if we observe growth in national income, per-capita income, occupational structure, capital
base, social overheads etc. we may say that Indian is a developing economy. Besides, India is a
mixed economy since here the means of production are partly owned by the private sector and
partly by the public sector.
214 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
CCCCCHHHHHAAAAAPPPPPTTTTTEEEEERRRRR ––––– 55555
INDIAN
ECONOMY –
A PROFILE
Unit 2
Role of
Different Sectors
in India
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Learning Objectives
At the end of this unit, you will be able to :
(cid:2) understand the role played by agriculture, industry and services in the growth of Indian
economy.
(cid:2) understand what qualities and quantitative changes have taken place in the various
productive sectors of the economy.
(cid:2) understand the various problems faced by these sectors in India.
Agriculture, industry and services are the major producing sectors of an economy. In this unit,
we will study about these sectors in some detail.
2.0 AGRICULTURE
2.0.0 Role of Agriculture in India : Agriculture is a very important sector of the Indian
economy. It plays a major role in the overall development of the country as it contributes 17 of
GDP and engages around 52 per cent of the population of the country.
(i) Providing employment: Agriculture provides employment to a large number of people in
India. At the time of Independence around 72 per cent of the population was engaged in
agriculture and allied activities. As economy developed, its other sectors (industry and
services) also developed and the percentage of people working in agriculture sector came
down to around 52 per cent in 2008-09. It must however, be noted that in absolute terms
there has been a big increase in the number of people engaged in agricultural activities.
Besides, a large number of people earn their living by working in occupations dependent
on agriculture like storage, procuring, trade and transport, marketing and export of
agricultural products.
(ii) Share in national income: Agriculture contributes a large share in the country's gross
domestic product. Its share in total GDP in 1950-51 was around 55 per cent which has
come down to 17 per cent in 2008-09. This reduced share indicates that the economy and
its non-agricultural sectors are growing, nevertheless share of 17 per cent is an indicator
of the fact that India is still predominantly an agricultural economy.
(iii) Supporting industries: Agriculture has a big role in the development of industries specially
the agro-based industries such as textiles, sugar, tea, paper. There are several other industries
like handloom, weaving and other cottage industries which also depend upon inputs
from agriculture. The prosperity of these agro-based industries is directly dependent upon
the availability of inputs from the agricultural sector. The prosperity of industries depends
on agricultural prosperity from another angle also. The demand for industrial products
depends upon the income of the farmers which in turn depends upon agricultural
production.
(iv) Shares in foreign trade: The country's foreign trade especially in the export of traditional
commodities like jute, tea, tobacco and coffee depends a great deal on the supplies of the
agricultural sector. In case of crop failures the country becomes a net importer of food
216 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
grains. Therefore, the balance of trade in the country is affected a great deal by the
performance of this sector.
At the time of Independence and a number of years thereafter our export basket mainly
consisted of three agro-production-cotton textiles, jute and tea. These three accounted for
more than 50 percent of our export earnings. If we consider other agricultural commodities
like cashew, kernels, tobacco, coffee, sugar, vegetable oil etc., the total share of agriculture
in total exports was about 70 per cent. As economy developed, the share of agricultural
exports in total exports fell down. In 2007-08 agricultural exports formed about 12.2 per
cent of the national exports. In recent years, special schemes (like Special Agricultural
Product Scheme) have been started to promote exports of fruits, vegetables, flowers, dairy
products and forest products.
As far as the agro-imports are concerned they constituted just 3.1 per cent of national
imports in 2007-08. This is very meager, considering the fact that nearly one-fourth of our
total import expenditure at the time of Independence and many years thereafter was on
agro-imports (food grains, pulses, edible oil etc.). India, over a period of time has become
self-sufficient in the production of agro-products and need to import them only when
there are severe shortages resulting from unfriendly weather conditions like droughts and
floods.
(v) Supplier of food and fodder: Agriculture meets almost the entire food-needs of the people.
In India, people spend a very large proportion of their incomes on food and food products.
Thus, the cost of living of people also gets affected by agricultural prosperity. If food is
costly; the cost of living of the people also gets affected to a great deal.
Agriculture also provides fodder to sustain livestock comprising of cattle, buffaloes, sheep
and poultry etc. Their number runs in crores. These provide employment and income to
many people in the rural and hilly areas.
(vi) Savings of capital: Agriculture has low capital output ratio; in other words it requires
lesser capital per unit of output produced compared with the industries. A capital poor
economy like India can make efforts to develop this sector which along with increase in
production could increase employment opportunity in the rural areas and could help in
solving problems of urban congestion and pollution in the cities.
(vii)Contributions to Government's revenue: The government revenues also depend a great
deal on agricultural prosperity. The direct contribution of agricultural taxes to the revenues
of the centre and the states is not significant but indirectly agriculture has a considerable
influence on the revenues of the central and state governments. Particularly, when due to
agricultural droughts, the revenue suffers a set-back, government expenditure on relief,
etc., goes up a great deal leading to heavy deficit in government budgets.
(viii)Solving problems of urban congestion and brain drain: Migration from rural areas to urban
areas and metropolitan cities has created a dual problem: on the one hand, it has deprived
rural areas of skilled and educated persons and, on the other hand, it has created the
problem of urban congestion. If agriculture is on the road to prosperity and is in a position
to absorb fruitfully the growing talent in rural areas, the dual problem of urban congestion
and rural brain drain will be solved.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 217
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
2.0.1 Growth of agriculture during planning period: In the following points we will learn
how agriculture sector has developed in India over the years:
I Increase in production and productivity: The following table shows how agricultural
production has progressed over the years.
Table 4 : Agriculture Production Million Tonnes
Commodity 1950-51 1991-92 2001-02 2007-08 2008-09
1. Foodgrains (m.t) 51.0 167.0 212.9 230.8 229.9
2. Pulses (m.t.) 8.4 12.0 13.4 14.8 14.2
3. Sugarcane (m.t.) 69.0 249.0 297.2 348.2 289.2
4. Oilseeds (m.t.) 5.1 18.3 20.7 29.8 28.1
5. Cotton (m. bales) 2.1 9.8 10.0 25.9 23.3
6. Jute and Mesta (m. bales) 3.5 9.2 11.7 11.2 10.3
We can see from the table that over the last 58 years, agriculture production has increased by
more than thrice. In 1950-51, food grains production was 51 million tonnes which increased to
231 million tonnes in 2007-08 (but reduced to 230 million tonnes in 2008-09).
Significant breakthrough in the production of food grains (often termed as Green Revolution)
has been made possible due to the adoption of the new agricultural strategy since 1966. This
strategy stressed upon the use of high-yielding varieties of seeds, proper irrigation facilities,
extensive use of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides often termed as High Yielding Varieties
Programmes (HYVP). Since the adoption of this Programme, the production and productivity
of food grains especially of wheat have increased sharply. The food grains production increased
from 81 million tonnes in the Third Plan (i.e. before HYVP) to 230 million tonnes in 2008-09.
Similarly, we find the production of pulses increased from 8.4 million tonnes to 14.2 million
tonnes, of sugarcane from 69 million tonnes to 348 million tonnes in 2007-08 (but fell to 289
million tonnes in 2008-09), of oilseeds from 5.1 million tonnes to 30 million tonnes in 2007-08
(but fell to 289 million tonnes in 2008-09), of cotton from 2.1 million bales to 23 million bales,
and of Jute and Mesta from 3.5 million bales to 10.3 million bales over the period 1950-51 to
2008-09.
HYVP was restricted to five crops - wheat, rice, bajra, jawar and maize. But among these,
wheat made wide strides with production increased by more than six times from 11 million
tonnes (annual average) in the third plan to 78.5 million tonnes in 2007-08. The productivity of
wheat during the same period has increased from 827 kilograms per hectare in 1965-67 to
2806 kilograms per hectare in 2008-09. On account of this, it is often said that the green
revolution is largely wheat revolution.
The long-term annual growth of food grains output has been around 2.42 per cent during
1967-68 to 2002-03 and the per capita availability of foodgrains has improved from about 395
gm in 1951 to 443 gm in 2007.
218 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Agricultural productivity is measured in terms of yield per hectare of land. Agricultural
productivity has increased at a rate of around 2.06 per cent per annum during 1967-2003.
There has been improvement in productivity of land in almost all commodities but it has been
more in the case of wheat and potatoes and only marginal in rest of the products. It is important
and necessary that productivity of land improves as there is hardly any scope for bringing
more land under cultivation.
II Diversified agriculture: Indian agriculture has become diversified as will be clear from
the following facts:
(cid:3) The share of non-crop sectors (fishery, forestry and animal husbandry) in total
agricultural output is increasing.
(cid:3) Area under commercial crop like sugar, cotton, oilseeds, etc. is increasing.
(cid:3) Within food grains, area under superior cereals (rice and wheat) is increasing and
area under the inferior cereals is declining.
III Modern agriculture: Some qualitative changes have taken place in agricultural sector
especially in India since 1966 when Green Revolution was started. These are:
(cid:3) The use of high-yielding varieties of seeds, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, threshing
machine is rising.
(cid:3) Farmers are increasingly resorting to intensive cultivation, multiple cropping, scientific
water management in some states.
(cid:3) There have been noticeable changes in the attitudes of farmers. They are ready to
accept new and scientific techniques of production.
(cid:3) Agricultural capacity has improved a lot. This has been made possible due to use of
modern techniques such as irrigation facilities, high-yielding varieties of seeds, tractors
and other modern machines.
(cid:3) A number of institutions have come up for marketing agricultural products for
providing agricultural credit, for purchasing and distributing of agricultural inputs
and storage etc. They have facilitated growth of agriculture.
IV. Improved agrarian system: At the time of Independence, there were three types of land
tenure systems prevailing in the country - the zamindari system, the ryotwari system and
the mahalwari system. In all these systems, the land was cultivated by tenants and they
paid rent for the use of land. Only the system of collecting rent or land revenue was
different in these land tenure systems. Whatever the system of collecting land revenue, the
tenant or the actual tiller of the land was exploited by the land owners. More than 25 per
cent of the produce was taken away by these intermediaries (zamindar etc.) in the form of
rent. These intermediaries did not work at all on the land but took away whatever surplus
above the minimum subsistence the cultivators produced. The cultivators did not show
any interest nor did they have any surplus left for modernisation of agriculture. Hence,
there was virtual stagnation in the agricultural sector.
In order to stop the exploitation of the actual tillers of the soil and to pass on the ownership
of land to them land reforms were introduced after Independence. Three measures were
contemplated to achieve these objectives:
GENERAL ECONOMICS 219
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(i) Abolition of Intermediaries
(ii) Tenancy reforms
(iii) Reorganisation of agriculture
Legislations were passed in all states to abolish zamindari system. As a result, around 173
million acres of land was acquired from the intermediaries and two crore tenants were
brought in direct contact with the state.
Under the tenancy reforms, three measures were taken (a) Regulation of rent (b) Security
of tenure and (c) Conferment of ownership rights on tenants.
Before Independence, the rent changed by the zamindars from the tenants was very high.
It ranged between 30 to 75 per cent. So after Independence, legislations were passed to fix
rents between 25-50 percent for different states. Security of tenure has also been provided
by these states by passing legislations which disallow ejectments of the tenants except in
accordance with the provisions of the law. Many States have also conferred ownership
rights on the tenants. It has been estimated that as result of laws conferring ownership
rights on tenants in various states, approximately 12.42 million tenants have acquired
ownership rights over 6.32 million hectare of land. Ceilings were also imposed on
agricultural holdings. That means limits were imposed on the amount of land which a
family could hold. Accordingly, a family could hold 18 acres of wet land or 54 acres of
unirrigated land. It has been estimated that 2.98 million hectares of land had been declared
surplus of which 2.18 million hectares has been distributed to 5.58 million beneficiaries.
In order to solve the problem of fragmentation of holdings, the land was reorganized.
Accordingly it was decided to consolidate holdings by giving to the farmer one consolidated
holding equal to the total of the land in different scattered plots under his possession.
Cooperative farming was also started but it did not succeed much.
Thus, we see that since Independence, we have a much improved agrarian system which
has resulted due to the land reforms undertaken by the government.
(V) Other developments : Apart from the above, the following developments have also taken
place:
(cid:3) Farmers have been getting material inputs at subsidised rates.
(cid:3) They are getting credit at low rates of interest.
(cid:3) Government is helping them in procuring their products at predetermined rates and
marketing them.
(cid:3) Minimum wage levels have been fixed for agricultural labourers.
(cid:3) Special programmes such as Integrated Rural Development Programme, Jawahar
Rozgar Yojana etc. have been started in rural areas to provide employment to the
rural people.
(cid:3) The National Food Security Mission (NFSM) is being implemented in identified districts
of different states. The aim is to have self sufficiency in different food crops like rice,
wheat and pulses.
220 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(cid:3) The Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY) is being implemented for integrated
development of food crops. The scheme focuses on agricultural mechanisation,
improvement of soil health and productivity, development of rain fed farming systems,
improvement of agricultural marketing and pest management.
(cid:3) Projects like Forecasting Agricultural Output using Space, Agro-meteorology and Land-
based Observations (FASAL) and Extended Range Forecasting System (ERFS) have
been started to establish a more scientific and reliable basis for forecasting.
(cid:3) Special schemes have been started to improve the production of rubber, coffee, bamboo,
poultry, etc.
2.0.2 Problems of agricultural sector in India: The agricultural sector in India faces the
following problems:
(1) Slow and uneven growth:
(a) The growth of agricultural sector is not sufficient to meet the rising demands of fast
growing population. While the population is growing at a rate of around 2 percent
per annum, food grain production has increased at an annual rate of 2.42 percent.
During the first six years of new millennium starting 2001-02, this sector has grown at a
modest rate of 3 per cent per annum. The poor performance of agricultural sector resulting
mainly from deficient and uneven rainfall in the recent years has led to creating inflationary
pressure in some primary products and reduction in the potential growth of other sectors by
dampening growth. This rate is just sufficient to maintain the existing standard of
consumption of people. If we desire better standards of consumption and nutrition,
then agriculture will have to grow at a higher rate.
(b) Certain crops (like wheat) are growing at a higher rate than other crops (like maize,
jawar etc.).
(c) Low yield per unit area across almost all crops has become a regular feature of Indian
agriculture. For example, though India accounted for 21.8 per cent of global rice production,
the estimated yield per hectare in 2004-05 was one-third than that of Egypt. Similarly, in
wheat while India accounted for 12 per cent of global production, its average yield was less
than a third of the highest yield level estimated for the U.K. in 2004-05. There is a need for
a renewed focus on improving productivity.
(d) There are regional imbalances in the spread of growth. The growth has remained
confined to certain areas like Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh.
(e) Till very recently, the attention and resources were devoted to the development of
agricultural crops and animal husbandry, fisheries and forestry were not given much
attention.
(2) Not so modern agriculture:
(a) The HYVP was initiated on a small area of 1.89 million hectares in 1966-67 and even
in 2003-04 only 80 million hectare of land was covered by this program which is just
44 per cent of the gross cropped area. Naturally, the benefits of the new technology
have remained confined to this area only.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 221
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(b) In many areas and in a number of crops old methods of ploughing, sowing and
harvesting etc. are still used. As a result, productivity in such areas and crops is very
low.
(c) About 60 per cent net sown area is rain fed and there are no appropriate dry-farming
techniques.
(d) Only 40 per cent of the gross cropped area has irrigation facilities.The irrigation sector
requires a renewed thrust both in terms of investment as also modern management.
(3) Flaws in Land reforms:
(a) The legislation measures have not been completed in all the states.
(b) There are snags in legislation like definitions of 'personal cultivation' and 'tenants'
were inadequate, substantial area were given to zamindars for their personal
cultivation, landlords often forced their tenants to surrender the lands voluntarily,
ceiling laws were inadequate and zamindars indulged in large scale transfer of land
to their family members in order to escape these laws.
(4) Problems relating to finance:
Since agriculture is an unorganized profession dependent mainly on rains, banks and
other financial institutions are reluctant to provide finance to this sector. In fact, till a very
long period after Independence the main source of agricultural credit was the moneylender
as organized institutions insisted on collateral securities. In 1951, moneylenders accounted
for as much as 71.6 percent of rural credit. Moneylenders used to charge exorbitant rates
of interest ranging from 18 to 50 percent. They often manipulated accounts and cheated
the poor uneducated farmers. Therefore, after Independence steps were taken to free farmers
from the clutches of money lenders, the most important being the expansion of institutional
credit to agriculture. Fourteen banks were nationalised in 1969 and six banks were
nationalised in 1980 with an important objective of providing credit to the rural and other
priority sectors. In 1975, the government established Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) to
specifically meet the requirements of the farmers and villages. This was followed by the
setting of an apex bank called National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
(NABARD) in 1982. Cooperative credit societies were also established to finance rural
projects at lower rates of interest. As a result of all these efforts the share of moneylenders
has reduced to about 17 per cent now and that of institutional credit has increased.
Of late a number of steps have been taken to enhance credit support to farmers. These
include:
(cid:3) Introduction of the “Farm Credit Package” in 2004. As a result of this package the
flow of credit to the farm sector has more than tripled during 2003-04 to 2008-09.
(cid:3) Kisan Credit Card scheme was started in 1998 to provide adequate and timely support
for the banking system to the farmers for their cultivation needs. More than 800 lakh
credit cards have been issued till date.
(cid:3) Under the aegis of NABARD, the government is trying to revive short term and long
term rural credit structure.
222 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(cid:3) In 2008-09, the government announced Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief
Scheme 2008. The scheme covered direct agricultural loans given to marginal and
small farmers and “other farmers”. Under the scheme, overdue loans worth Rs 50000
crore were waived and for loans worth Rs 10000 crore one time settlement relief was
provided.
(cid:3) A rehabilitation package for distressed farmers has also been initiated.
Although much improvement has taken place in agricultural finance, the following
problems have emerged:
(cid:3) Agricultural loans are concentrated in certain region and states. For example, nearly
half of the agricultural bank credit is concentrated in Southern States.
(cid:3) The proportion of overdue to demand has been increasing. Nearly 40 per cent of the
amount financed does not come back to the society.
(cid:3) The major beneficiaries of the agricultural credit have been the large and medium
farmers.
(cid:3) There is a lack of experienced and skilled staff in these institutions.
(5) Problems relating to warehousing and marketing:
(a) The storage facilities with the individual farmers are normally very primitive types in
the form of dug-holes and pits. As a result 10 - 15 percent of agriculture produce gets
spoiled or eaten by rats. Government agencies like Food Corporation of India provide
storage facilities but these are inadequate.
(b) There is a lack of organization among farmers so they do not get a fair price from the
purchasers who are generally well-organized.
(c) There are a number of agents between the producers (farmers) and the consumers
(buyers). They charge a heavy amount as their fees or as commission. As a result, the
farmers do not get a fair share in the total product price charged.
(d) Because of heavy indebtedness, the farmers are many times forced to sell their produces
at low prices and sometimes due to lack of proper transport facilities in the nearest
market at not so great prices.
(e) A great number of farmers live just for subsistence. Their marketable surplus is very
low or almost nil.
(f) Several malpractices exist in unorganized agricultural markets such as under
weighing, levying of a number of unauthorised fees and taxes etc.
(g) The farmers are many a times not well informed about the prevailing market conditions
including prices prevailing in the markets.
(h) Grading and standardisation are at a very low level. So often inferior quality gets
mixed up with superior one, killing the motivation of farmers to produce superior
quality products.
(i) In order to meet the needs of poor people in the country, the government runs a
network of ration shops and fair price shops which provide food grains and other
GENERAL ECONOMICS 223
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
essential commodities at very low prices to consumers. But it has been seen that these
ration shops have catered to the needs of all and sundry. Despite the massive coverage
of these shops, the total requirements of food grains of all vulnerable sectors are not
met.
There is a need to develop marketing infrastructure, storage, warehousing, cold chains
and spot markets that are driven by modern technology. In this direction some steps have
been recently taken. These include:
(cid:3) To bring about reforms in agricultural marketing, Agricultural Produce Market
Committee (APMC) Act is being amended by various states.
(cid:3) To transfer agricultural technologies and information to the farming sector a number
of initiatives have been taken by the Department of Agriculture & Cooperation. These
include, setting up of Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centres (ACABC), setting up of
Kisan Call Centres and developing of Kisan Knowledge Management System (KKMS)
etc.
(cid:3) The National Policy for Farmers, 2007 is being adopted by the government. Major
policy provisions include provisions for assets reforms, water use efficiency, use of
technology, inputs and services, good quality seeds, disease free planting material,
credit insurance etc.
Agriculture under XI Plan : Agriculture occupies a special treatment in the XI Plan Approach
Paper. The Plan targets at doubling the growth rate in agriculture from less than 2 per cent achieved
in the X Plan to around 4 per cent in XI plan period. This requires increased investment in projects like
irrigation, water shed development in rainfed areas, rail road connectivity and rural electrification.
The Plan also focusses on removing knowledge deficit and improving technology, enhancing productinity
of farm incomes, improving marketing, evolving viable packages for individual agro climatic zones
and removing distortions in farm subsidies etc. A second green revolution is urgently needed to raise
the growth rate of agricultural GDP to 4 per cent.
2.1 INDUSTRY
2.1.0 Role of Industry in India: In any economy, industries have an important role to play. In
fact, it has been noticed that countries which are industrially well developed (example USA)
have higher per capita income than those countries where industries are not well developed
(example: India, Pakistan). The only exception to this could be the petroleum exporting countries
(like UAE) which have a higher per capita income due to abundance of petroleum products
and virtual monopoly in export of petroleum products.
In India, industrial sector plays the following roles:
i) Modernising agriculture: It modernises agriculture and improves productivity in it. It
provides agriculture with the latest tools and equipments which enhance efficiency in this
sector.
ii) Providing employment: Indian economy being labour surplus economy needs sectors which
absorb ever increasing labour-force. Industries can play an important role here. It is the
establishment of industries alone that can generate employment opportunities on an
224 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
accelerated rate. At present, industries engage only 18 per cent of the labour force of India
and there is a need to industrialise country and that too quickly.
iii) Share in the GDP: Over the years, the value-added by industrial sector in the GDP has
improved from 12 percent in 1950-51 to 25.8 per cent in 2007-08.
iv) Contribution to exports: Indian industries contribute tremendously to the export earnings
of India. In fact, manufactured goods alone contribute around two third of the export
earnings of India.
v) Raising incomes of the people: Industries generally help in raising the incomes of the
people of a country. This is possible because industries are not dependent on vagaries of
nature. By putting in more efforts, capital and improved technology industrial output and
production can be raised. In fact, in this sector, the benefits of large scale production can
be reaped. Higher industrial output results in higher income per head. In fact, in the
industrially developed countries, the GNP per capita is very high as compared to the GNP
per capita in industrially developing countries. For example, in USA GNP per capita was
$ 46,000 and in India it was just $950 in 2007.
vi) Enhancing further the economic growth: As industrialisation grows, the role of capital
goods vis-à-vis consumer goods gains strength. This helps in enhancing further the
economic growth. It helps an economy to attain self-sustaining growth.
vii) Meeting high-income demands: Beyond certain limits, the demand of the people for
agricultural products falls and for industrial products rises. Industries help in meeting
these ever-increasing demands.
viii)Strengthening the economy: Industries help strengthen the economy in a number of ways:
(a) The growth of industries producing capital goods i.e. machines, equipments etc. lets a
country to produce a number of goods in large quantities and at low cost. This gives
industrial character to the economy and strengthens its infrastructure (b) It makes possible
the production of economic infrastructure goods like railways, dams etc. which in any
case are non-importable. (c) Agriculture gets improved farm-implements, chemical fertilizers
and transport and storage facilities due to industries. (d) Dependence on foreign sources
for defense materials is a risky matter. Industrialisation helps a country to become self-
reliant in defense materials.
2.1.1 Growth of industrial sector in India: All the industries of a country can be grouped in
two major ways (i) on the basis of the size of industries and (ii) on the basis of end-use.
(i) On the basis of size of industries: On the basis of size of the industries, they can be divided
into large industries, medium industries and small industries. Large industries which largely
form the basis of the country's index of industrial production include the following
industries: (a) mining and quarrying (often referred as mining); (b) manufacturing; and
(c) electricity, gas and water supply (often referred as electricity).
(ii) On the basis of end-use: On the basis of end-use of output, industries are divided into:
(a) Basic goods industries (like minerals, fertilizers, cement, iron and steel, non-ferrous
basic metals, electricity etc.)
GENERAL ECONOMICS 225
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(b) Capital goods industries (like machinery, machine tools, rail-road equipments etc.)
(c) Intermediate goods (like chemicals, rubber, plastic, coal and petroleum products)
(d) Consumer goods - consumer durables and non durables (like man-made fibers,
beverages, watches, cosmetics, perfumes etc.).
The growth rate of industrial output over the planning period has been nearly satisfactory.
The industrial production has grown at an annual average rate of 6.2 per cent per annum over
the planning period. Consider Table 5 and 6. They show how growth has taken place in the
industrial sector since 1951.
Table: 5 : Annual Growth Rates in Index Numbers of Industrial Production
Use Based 1951 1955 1960 1966 1980 1992 1997 2002 2005 2007 2008
Classification to to to to to to to to to to to
1955 1960 1965 1980 1992 1997 2002 2003 2006 2008 2009
1. Basic Goods 4.7 12.1 10.4 5.9 7.4 6.8 4.1 4.9 6.7 7.0 2.5
2. Capital Goods 9.8 13.1 19.6 6.6 9.4 8.9 4.7 10.5 15.8 18.0 7.0
3. Intermediate Goods 7.8 6.3 6.9 4.5 4.9 8.5 5.8 3.9 2.5 9.0 -2.8
4. Consumer Goods 4.8 4.4 4.9 5.0 6.0 6.6 5.5 7.1 12.0 6.1 4.4
(a) Durables - - - 10.8 10.8 13.4 10.7 -6.3 15.3 -1.0 4.4
(b) Non-durables - - - 5.0 5.3 4.8 3.8 12.0 11.0 8.6 4.4
General Index 5.7 7.2 9.0 4.1 7.8 7.4 5.0 5.7 8.2 8.5 2.4
Table 6 : Annual Growth Rates of Industrial Production in Major Sectors of Industry
(Per cent per annum)
Base = Base = Base = 1993-94 Base = 1993-94
1980-81 1980-81
1950-51 1980-81 1993-94 2005 2006 2007 2008
to to to to to to to
1980-81 1990-91 2004-05 2006 2007 2008 2009
Mining and Quarrying 4.5 6.4 4.4 1.0 3.8 5.1 2.3
Manufacturing 5.1 6.8 9.2 9.1 11.5 9.0 2.3
Electricity, Gas and Water 9.5 8.8 5.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 2.8
2.1.2 Pattern of Industrial Development since Independence: Now in the following points
we will make a comprehensive review of the pattern of industrial development during the
planning era since 1951. The industrial development pattern on the eve of Independence was
characterized by the following elements:
226 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(a) Lop-sided pattern of development dominated by too large and too small industrial units,
with very few medium size units. There was a high concentration of employment in small
industries and household industries (31%) and in large industries (43%).
(b) Capital employed per worker in industry was very low because of low priority given to
industry, low level of domestic demand and low per capita income.
(c) Consumer goods industries were well-established to the utter neglect of capital goods
industries like steel, machinery, heavy electrical and chemicals. The country had to largely
depend on imports for capital goods.
The progress of industrialisation during the last five and a half decades has been striking.
There has been a remarkable development of capital goods industries, substantial
diversification and broad-basing of manufactured products, phenomenal development of
small scale industries. An impressive base has been created in sophisticated and high
technology industrial sectors like electronics, machine tools, telecommunication equipment
and the like.
(1) Industrial growth experienced ups and downs during the period 1951 to 2008-09. There
was steady growth of about 8 per cent during the first three plan period viz., 1951-65.
Thereafter, a significant decline was experienced for 15 years 1965-80 when the annual
rate of industry fell down to 4.1 per cent per annum. The situation improved during 1980-
91 when the annual rate of industrial growth became 7.8 per cent. Then there was a brief
spell (1991-93) of restructuring and consequent lower growth rates. The industrial
production recorded a very low growth of 0.6 per cent during 1991-92 and a small growth
of 4 per cent during 1992-93. Since then the situation has improved a lot. The annual
average growth during 1992-2000 turns out to be 6 per cent.
The industrial growth slowed down to 5 per cent in 2000-2001. In 2001-2002, the industrial
growth rate was very low at 2.7 per cent. This happened because of lack of domestic
demand for intermediate goods, low inventory demand for capital goods, high oil prices
and existence of excess capacity and infrastructural constraints. The Tenth Plan (2002-
2007) aimed at achieving a growth rate of 10 per cent in the industrial sector.
Notwithstanding a distinct improvement in the manufacturing growth in the last three
years (9.2 per cent in 2004-2005, 9.1 per cent in 2005-2006 and 11.5 per cent in 2006-07),
overall industrial growth at an average of around 8.7 per cent per annum has remained well
short of the target.
The Eleventh Plan aims at 8.5 per cent per annum growth in the GDP. This will require
industry to grow at 10% per annum and manufacturing at 12 per cent during the Eleventh
Plan.
The industrial sector after recording robust growth during 2004-07, started showing signs
of moderation in the first half of 2007-08 although overall growth rate remained relatively
high at 8.5 per cent. The year 2008-09 has, however, been marked by a very strong
downturn in growth due to a multitude of factors, the most important being the global
financial shock that impacted the whole industrial sector. Persistent increase in the crude
oil prices during January 2006-July 2008, decline in the foreign direct investment, shrinkage
in demand for exports, decline in domestic demand and consequent decrease in profits
GENERAL ECONOMICS 227
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
led to lack lustre performance of the industrial sector in 2008-09. The industrial rate of
growth tumbled down to 2.4 per cent in 2008-09 from 8.5 per cent in 2007-08.
In the period 1965-80 not only there was a deceleration in the industrial growth but the
industrial structure also witnessed the phenomenon of retrogression. In other word, the
growth of elite-oriented consumption goods such as man-made fibers, beverages, perfumes,
cosmetics, watches, clocks, etc. was considerably higher than the goods which satisfied
the needs of mass of the people such as coal, cotton, railways, etc.
The various reasons behind the process of deceleration and retrogression are:
(a) Unsatisfactory performance of agriculture.
(b) Slackening of real investment especially in public sector.
(c) Slow-down in import substitution.
(d) Regulation and control over private sector in the form of industrial licensing, MRTP
Act, high taxation, price and distribution controls, foreign exchange control etc.
(e) Narrow market for industrial goods, especially in rural areas.
(2) The structure of industry has shifted in favour of basic and capital goods and intermediate
goods sector during the period of planning since 1951. The programme of industrialisation
was started on a massive scale in the Second Plan (1956-61). Based on the Mahalanobis
model, this Plan emphasized on building basic and capital goods industries so that a strong
base for development in future could be made. Three Steel Plants were set up in the public
sector at Bhilai, Rourkela and Durgapur. Public Sector made advances in machine building,
machine tools, railway locomotives, heavy electrical, ship building, fertilizers etc. In
subsequent plans and for almost four decades (1951-90), the strategy to favour basic and
capital goods and to give public sector the responsibility to develop these industries was
followed. As a result, we now have a strong industrial base in the country (see table 5).
(3) There has been a remarkable growth of consumer goods industries especially those
manufacturing elite-oriented consumer goods such as man made fibers, finer varieties of
textiles, beverages, cigarettes, motor cars, motor cycles and scooters, refrigerators, TVs,
air-conditioners, electrical goods like fans, watches and clocks, cosmetics and so on.
In first four decades after Independence, the stress was on the establishment of basic and
capital goods. Since 1991, important changes have occurred in the industrial structure.
Intermediate and consumer goods have got more importance than basic and capital goods.
As a result, the output of consumer durables goods has expanded at rapid pace especially
since 1991 (see table 5).
(4) Industrial sector has become broad-based and modernised. The role of traditional industries
like textiles has reduced and role of non-traditional industries like engineering goods,
chemical goods and electrical goods has improved tremendously. Manufacturing capabilities
over a period of time have strengthened. We now manufacture a wide array of goods like
food products, leather products, chemicals products, rubber and plastic products, metal
products, machinery, transport and equipments, paper products, wood products and so
on. The broad progress of mining, manufacturing and electricity industries can be seen in
Table 6.
228 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(5) There has been a massive increase in the size and diversification of public sector. Before
Independence, the existence of public sector was only nominal. The post-Independence
period saw a sea change so far as the emergence of public sector was concerned. On the
eve of the First Plan, the number of central public sector units was just 5 with a total
capital of about Rs. 30 crores. In March 2008, the number of public sector industrial units
increased to 242 with a cumulative investment of about Rs. 4,55,000 crores. Several public
sector giants like ONGC, Indian Oil Corporation, Steel Authority of India, Bharat Heavy
Electricals, HMT, HAL, BEL, Cement Corporation of India, Coal India and NTPC dominate
the Indian industrial scene.
Out of 242 Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) 160 are making profits. Their net
profits stood at more than Rs 91000 crore in 2007-08. The net loss of loss making enterprises
(53) on the other hand stood at around Rs 11270 crore.
(6) So far as the private sector is concerned, the dominance of large and monopoly business
houses has increased several times. There were hardly two large business houses - Tata
and Birla in 1951 but now not only the number of big business houses has increased
enormously to about 80 (which include Reliance Group, Bajaj, Thapars, Mafatlals,
Kirloskars, Goenka, Chhabria, Shriram, Walchand, Singhania and so on) their assets have
also increased enormously during the last 50 years. Their aggregate assets amounted to
more than Rs. 10,00,000 crores in 2008 compared to just Rs. 50,000 crores in 1990-91.
(7) A remarkable expansion and sophistication took place in infrastructural facilities since
1951, in such respects as power generation, development of energy sources, railway
transport, telecommunication, roads and road transport and the like, which are basic pre-
requisites for industrial development. Large scale railway electrification and dieselisation,
extensive discovery of petroleum and gas reserves and their extraction, nationalisation of
coal mining and its development, petroleum refineries, pipelines, storage and distribution
arrangements, hydro, thermal and atomic power generation, together with manufacture
of heavy electrical equipment, electricity grids, electronic telephone exchange and micro-
wave long distance telephone facilities, cellular mobile telephone services, electronic mail
services and so on were taken up; significant strides made in these and other infrastructural
facilities have catalyzed industrial development in several ways. Industrial finance was
supported heavily by financial institutions (LIC, IDBI, ICICI for example) and commercial
banks. Port facilities for imports and exports have been substantially expanded.
(8) The country could be proud of achieving remarkable progress in the science and technology
front. Several Research laboratories were set up under the leadership of Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research. R & D facilities were installed in public and private sector units.
Technological know-how was extensively imported through foreign technical collaboration
arrangements. Science, Engineering, Management and other professional educational
institutions have been established on a large scale. An elite cadre of scientific, technical
and professional manpower has been built; India ranks high in the world in respect of
technological talent and manpower and in development of information and communication
technology, space research, nuclear technology, electronics and so on.
(9) One of the notable features of the planning era since 1951 has been the mammoth growth
of small-scale industrial units. Small-scale industrial units are those who operate with a
modest investment in fixed capital, relatively small-scale work force and which produce a
GENERAL ECONOMICS 229
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
relatively small volume of output of goods/services. They differ from large-scale industries
with respect to size of capital, employment, production and management, flow of input
and outputs and so on.
The present Act - Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 has broadly
classified the enterprises in those engaged in (i) manufacturing and (ii) providing of services.
Both categories have been further classified in Micro, small and medium based on their investment.
In manufacturing sector units with investment upto 25 lakh are called micro enterprises, units
with investment between Rs. 25 lakh and Rs. 5 crore are called small enterprises and units with
investment between Rs. 5 crore and Rs. 10 crore are called medium enterprises. In the service
sector, units with investment upto Rs. 10 lakh are called micro units and units between 10 lakh
and Rs. 2 crore are called small emterprises and units with investment between Rs. 2 crore and
Rs. 5 crore are called medium enterprises.
The number of registered and unregistered units was about 16,000 in 1950; it has gone up
to more than 128 lakh in 2006-07.
Since Independence, there has been an all-round development of small-scale and cottage
industries in India. Their performance and contribution to the growth of the industrial
economy of India has been quite remarkable. This will be clear from the following points:
(a) The growth rate of small-scale sector @ 10% per annum in terms of production has
been far faster than that of large scale sector since 1973. The production in small scale
and cottage industries increased from Rs. 13,600 crores in 1973-74 to more than
Rs. 5,85,000 crores in 2006-07. It is estimated that they contribute about 39% of the
gross value of output in the manufacturing sector.
(b) The number of registered and unregistered small-scale units which stood at 16,000
units in 1950 increased to 5.30 lakhs in 1981-82 and 128.4 lakhs in 2006-07.
(c) The small-scale sector employed nearly 312 lakhs persons in 2006-07 compared to 67
lakhs and 90 lakhs persons in 1979-80 and 1984-85 respectively. This represents about
60% of the total industrial employment. Employment in small-scale and cottage
industries is next only to that of agricultural sector.
(d) Exports from this sector increased from Rs. 852 crores in 1973-74 to Rs. 4,535 crores
in 1988-89 and further to around more than Rs. 1,50,000 crores in 2005-06. It is
estimated that this sector contributes over 40 per cent of the manufacturing exports
and 33 per cent of the total exports.
(e) Small-scale industrial units produce a very wide range of producer goods and consumer
goods items needed by the economy. They include both simple and sophisticated
engineering products, electrical, electronics, chemicals, plastics, steel, cement, textiles,
paper, matches, ready made garments and so on.
(f) Ancillary units contribute greatly and cater to the requirements of medium and large
industrial units for materials, components, consumables and so on.
(g) The traditional village and cottage industries which are generally clubbed with modern
small-scale industries provide means of living to artisans, sustain viability of countless
number of villages and towns, enrich the quality of life in society by providing fine
handicrafts and pieces of art and project the heritage of India.
230 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(h) A large number of small-scale industries are engaged in the manufacture of consumer
goods of mass consumption, thereby making them available in plenty which serves as
a non-inflationary force.
(i) The encouragement of small-scale and cottage industries with their higher output-
capital ratio and employment-capital ratio has become a stabilizing force in the Indian
economy. The employment generating capacity per unit of capital of small and cottage
industries was found to be at least eight times greater than that of large industries
while the output generating capacity per unit of capital was three times larger than
that of large industries.
2.1.3 Problems of Industrial Development in India
(1) Failure to achieve targets: Except a few years, when targets of overall growth in the
industrial sector were achieved, in the entire period of planning, achievements have been
below targets. The average industrial growth rate during 1951 to 2007-08 has been around
6.2 per cent relative to the target of 8 per cent per annum. The following table shows how
far our targets on the industrial front have been met:
Table 7 : Growth Rate of Industrial Production
(Per cent per annum)
Five year Plan/Annual Plan Target Actual
I (1951-56) 7.0 7.3
II (1956-61) 10.5 6.6
III (1961-66) 11.0 9.0
Annual Plans (1966-69) - 2.0
IV (1969-74) 12.0 4.7
V (1974-79) 8.0 5.9
Annual Plan (1979-80) - 1.4
VI (1980-85) 8.0 5.9
VII (1985-90) 8.7 8.5
Annual Plan (1990-92) - 8.0
VIII (1992-97) 7.4 7.3
IX (1997-02) 8.2 5.2
X (2002-07) 10.0 8.7
XI (2007-12) 10.0 -
(2) Under-utilization of capacity: A large number of industries experience endemic under-
utilization of production capacity. The magnitude of under-utilisation varies from 20% to
60% in different industrial sectors, the average under-utilisation being in the region of
40% to 50%.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 231
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
It is argued by some that the net output of industries in India could be easily increased by
30 to 40% without any investment in capital equipment, but by better management of
purchasing, production, manpower and marketing systems.
The factors responsible for under-utilization of capacity are said to be: (a) indiscriminate
grabbing and creation of capacities by private enterprise (b) demand short-falls (c) over-
optimistic demand projections (d) supply bottle-necks, (e) labour problems and (f) deliberate
under-utilisation to create shortages and thereby to corner more profits.
(3) Absence of world class infrastructure : The most critical barrier to growth of the industrial
sector is the absence of world class infrastructure. The short supply of transport facilities,
frequent power failures and poor condition of roads have hampered the growth of industry in
general.
(4) Increasing capital-output ratio: Another very disturbing future of industrial development
of India is the ever-rising average and incremental capital output ratio (ICOR). The latter
which was 2.95 during the first plan increased to 3.9 during the Seventh Plan and further
to around 4 during Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Plans. The increasing trend of capital output
ratios could be explained in terms of increasing capital costs of new industrial units, highly
capital intensive nature of basic and heavy units, under-utilisation of capacity,
unremunerative administered prices in respect of basic goods and services and so on.
(5) High cost industrial economy: The costs and prices of manufactured goods and services
in India are generally much higher than international costs and prices. The consuming
public is obliged to bear high burden. The high cost economy is attributed to import
substitution, government protection to indigenous industries, monopolistic tendencies in
several industrial areas, high wage rates, increasing capital intensity in industrial units,
outdated technology low productivity of labour, uneconomic size of industrial units, lack
of cost consciousness among industrial magnates and managers and so on.
(6) Inadequate employment generation: One of the most serious deficiencies of industrial
development over the decades since Independence has been its inadequate employment
generation in relation to investment made. The process of industrialisation has failed to
make a marked dent on the unemployment problem in India. Factory employment absorbed
only 2% of the labour force in 1980. There was only a marginal increase in the rate in
1980s. Employment generation through industrialisation has also been decreasing over
the decades. According to the Annual Survey of industries, there has been a decline in the
absolute number of persons engaged in the industrial sector between 1995-96 and 2004-05. Even
labour intensive manufacturing sub-sectors like leather, food products, jute and leather products
failed to generate adequate employment in the recent years. Though employment generation is
one of the major objectives of five year plans, industrialisation, especially large-scale factory
oriented industrialisation with high capital intensity has proved itself to be incapable of
generating substantial direct employment. It may provide some indirect employment in
ancillary sector and in the services sector which grow in tune with manufacturing activity.
(7) Poor performance of public sector: Though public sector has grown by leaps and bounds
over the planning period backed by massive public investment, its performance on production
and profit fronts has been generally disappointing. Though profit may not always be the
appropriate criterion for evaluating the performance of public sector industrial units, its
232 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
relevance cannot be ignored altogether. Commercial and economic efficiency is to a large
extent reflected in profit. A loss making undertaking becomes weakened in course of time. It
loses dynamism and survival capability. A large number of public sector units are 'loss leaders'
in the industrial sphere while the rate of profitability of others is low. The accumulated losses
of central public sector units stood at more than Rs. 42,000 crore in 2005-06 compared to
Rs. 83,725 crore in 2004-05.
(8) Sectoral imbalances: Planned economic and industrial development pre-supposes
coordinated and balanced development of all sectors. There should be proper fine tuning
of all sectors so that they reinforce each other. In India, industrial development on an
over-all basis suffered several set- backs because of inadequate support from agriculture
and infrastructure. Even within the industrial sector the input-output relations between
individual industries like steel and machine building, petro-chemicals and fertilizers, are
such that they have to be developed in harmony. But in real practice, several sectoral
imbalances plague the industrial economy of India.
(9) Regional imbalances: Industrial development continues to be lopsided, region-wise. Large
scale industries are concentrated in a very few states like Maharashtra, West Bengal,
Tamilnadu and Gujarat. These four States account for 44% of total factories and 48% of
productive capital. It is true that a large number of new industrial growth centers have
emerged since Independence in several States like Bihar, U.P., Punjab, A.P., Karnataka,
M.P., and Rajasthan. But these States continue to be industrially backward. The industrial
units established in these States have somehow failed to generate further industrialisation.
Also several States have not been able to attract major industrial units in spite of incentives
and facilities because of the magnetic pull of industrially advanced States. Even small
units have tended to concentrate around urban conglomerates along with large-scale units
than in backward states and small towns.
(10) Industrial sickness: Industrial sickness has become a serious problem affecting small,
medium and large units. It is a major area of concern due to its implications for the entire
economy and health of the industrial sector in particular. In March 2007, there were 1.18
lakh sick units out of which more than 96 percent were small units. Industrial sickness has
been spreading over the years. The causes of sickness are identified as financial
mismanagement, demand recession, labour unrest, working capital shortage, cost
escalations, shortage of raw materials, uneconomic size, out-dated machinery and
equipment and so on.
2.2 SERVICES
The service sector or tertiary sector of an economy involves provision of services to other business
enterprises as well as to final consumers. Service sector includes:
(cid:3) Business services and professional services - Accounting, Advertising, Architectural and
Engineering, Computer and related services and Legal services.
(cid:3) Communication services - Audio-visual services, Postal and Courier services,
Telecommunications.
(cid:3) Real estate and related services.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 233
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(cid:3) Distributive services.
(cid:3) Education services.
(cid:3) Energy services.
(cid:3) Environmental services.
(cid:3) Financial services.
(cid:3) Health and social services.
(cid:3) Tourism services.
(cid:3) Transport services - Air transport services, Maritime services, services auxiliary to all modes
of transport.
2.2.0. Role of service sector in India : The service sector in India is its largest sector and
accounts for increasingly significant share of GDP. This sector is growing very fast. It is playing
an important role in the development of the economy as would be clear from the following
points:
(1) Increasing share in the GDP: Over the planning period, the share of tertiary or services
sector has increased from about one third of GDP in 1950-51 to more than half in 2007-08.
In 2007-08, its share in the GDP was more than 57 per cent. Although compared to high
income industrialised economies (where value added by services generally exceeds 60 per
cent of the total output) it is not very high but considering the fact that India is still a
developing economy, this figure is appreciable.
(2) Providing employment: Service sector occupied about 17.3 per cent of working population
in 1951. In 2001, around 22.5 per cent of working population was dependent on service
sector for occupation.
(3) Providing support to other sectors: Service sector provides support to agriculture and
industries by providing a number of services in the form of financial services, transport
services, storage services, distributive services, software and communication services and
so on. No sector can perform and prosper in the absence of network of various financial
and other services.
(4) Contribution to Exports: Services exports from India comprise services such as travel,
transportation, insurance, communication, construction, financial services, software,
agency services, royalties, copyright and licence fees and management services. Services
accounted for more than 45 per cent of total exports in India (2007-08). The potential for
growth, however, continues to be large. Software and other services such as business,
technical and professional services have emerged as the major categories in India's export
of services. In 2006, India's share in world's total commercial services export was 2.7 per
cent compared to 2.3 per cent in 2005 and 0.57 per cent in 1990. Indian services exports
recorded a growth of around 29 per cent per annum during 2000-2006. The global recession
started impacting export of services and its growth came down to 28 per cent in 2006-07
and to 22 per cent in 2007-08. In the list of exporters of commercial services (2008), India
is ranked 9th.
234 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
2.2.1 Growth of service sector during planning period: The service sector now accounts for
more than half of India's GDP: 57 per cent in 2007-08. It has gained at the expense of both the
agricultural and industrial sectors through the 1990s.
Generally as an economy grows, the share of primary sector in GDP falls and shares of secondary
and tertiary sectors increase. The occupational distribution of the working force also undergoes
changes. The percentage of people engaged in primary activities particularly agriculture falls
and percentage of people engaged in secondary sector and tertiary sector rises. Except a few
cases, this has been the experience of almost all developed countries. There, the growth of
industries was accompanied by the development of tertiary activities on one hand, and the
relative decline of primary activities on the other. If we consider Indian economy we find that
though India has followed the above route, its secondary sector has failed to grow substantially.
The tertiary sector has by passed the secondary sector. The rise in the service sector's share in
GDP marks a structural shift in the Indian economy and takes it closer to the fundamentals of
a developed economy (in the developed economies, the industrial and service sectors contribute
a major share in GDP while agricultural accounts for a relatively lower share).
Some economists fear that if the service sector bypasses the industrial sector, economic growth
can be distorted. They say that service sector growth must be supported by proportionate
growth of the industrial sector, otherwise service sector growth will not be sustainable. It is
true that service sector’s contribution to GDP has sharply risen and that of industry has not
grown that fast, but it is equally true that the industrial sector has grown and grown quite
impressively through the 1990s (except in 1998-99) and in the Tenth Plan.
If we analyze growth rate in the service sector, we find that it grew by 7.54 per cent per
annum in the Eighth Plan and around 8.1 per cent per annum in the Ninth Plan.
The Government of India gave a special status to the service sector in the Export and Import
Policy (2002-07). The average growth rate of service sector during the Tenth Plan turned out to be
around 9 per cent per annum. The Eleventh Plan aims at an annual average growth rate of 9.4 per
cent for the service sector.
The growth in the services sector has been broad based. Among the sub sectors of services,
“transport, storage and communication” has been the fastest growing with growth averaging
15.3 per cent per annum during the Tenth plan. In 2007-08 and 2008-09 they grew at 15.5 per
cent rate and 9 per cent respectively.
India being a sub-continent with varied geographical, climatic, ethnic, cultural, religious and
social conditions attracts tourists worldwide. The tourism industry is growing very fast and
has the potential for growing still faster. Trade, hotels and restaurants after recording an
average growth rate of 8 per cent in 2000-07, recorded a still higher growth of 10 per cent in
2007-08. In 2008-09, however, their growth decelerated to 9 per cent.
The other notable segment of India's service sector is fast growing financial services segment.
This statement is growing very fast and is in the process of transition. Until recently, this sector
was under the government control. Now, this sector is undergoing liberal reform process
including introduction of an element of competition cutting off the barriers and allowing entry
to foreign companies.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 235
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
IINNDDIIAANN EECCOONNOOMMYY –– AA PPRROOFFIILLEE
Financial, insurance, real estate and business services recorded an average growth of 7.9 per
cent during 2000-07. During 2007-08 and 2008-09 their growth rate was to 11.7 per cent and
7.8 per cent respectively.
Community, social and personal services which grew at an average rate of 6 per cent per
annum in 2000-07, recorded a growth rate of 6.8 per cent and 13 per cent in 2007-08 and
2008-09 respectively.
India has second largest scientific and technical manpower in the world. India's consultancy
professionals possess capability to provide expertise in sophisticated areas like information
and technology, advanced financial and banking services etc. to developed countries like USA,
UK, France, West Germany and Australia. Other areas of consultancy include infrastructure,
economic and social sectors, water resource management, environment, transfer technology
etc.
India's health services, super-speciality hospitals specialising in both modern and traditional
Indian medicine systems (like Ayurveda, Unani, and Nature care) supported by state of the art
equipment, are attracting patients from across the world.
Education is another field which is not only a big segment of the services sector with the
country but also a foreign exchange earner by way of NRIs, and foreign students enrolled in
India. We also export manpower even to the western world.
Entertainment industry (including films, music, broadcast, television and live entertainment)
is another service industry which has grown very fast after Independence.
Thus services sector has maintained a steady growth pattern since last two decades. But if we
consider its share in the employment, we find that there has been a relatively slow growth of
jobs in this sector. This is primarily because of rise in labour productivity in services sectors
such as information technology that is dependent on the skilled labour. Growth in tourism and
tourism-related services such as hotels holds a large potential for employment generation.
IT enabled services, such as Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) have been growing rapidly
(60-70 per cent) in the recent past and will continue to grow. Outsourcing has changed the
image of India. Western companies are seeing India as their top destination for outsourcing
work.
Factors underlying the Services Sector Growth
The Services sector has grown at a fast rate in India due to the following reasons:
(cid:3) It has been noticed that income elasticity of demand for services is greater than one. Hence,
the final demand for services grows faster than the demand for goods and commodities as
income rises.
(cid:3) Technical and structural changes in the economy have made it more efficient to out source
certain services that were once produced with in the industry.
(cid:3) With the advent of the information technology revolution, it has become possible to deliver
services over long distances at a reasonable cost, thus trade in services has increased world
wide. India has been particular beneficiary of this trend. Services exports increased four
fold in the 1990s and reached US$ 90 billion in 2007-08.
223366 CCOOMMMMOONN PPRROOFFIICCIIEENNCCYY TTEESSTT
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(cid:3) Economic reforms initiated since 1991 also impacted on the performance of the services
sector. Increased demand for manufacturing industry provided synergies to the services
sector. Also, liberalisation of financial sector provided an environment for faster growth of
the financial services. Moreover, reforms in certain segments of infrastructure services
also contributed to the growth of services.
2.2.2 Problems of service sector in India: Although service sector is doing remarkably well, it
is facing lots of problems, important ones are:
(1) Achieving rapid growth of the economy and its counterparts requires a very high quality
of infrastructure. Unfortunately, our infrastructure is inadequate not only in the rural
areas but also in the urban areas. For example, power shortage and traffic congestions are
very common in Bangalore, the silicon city of India. These affect the quality of services
provided.
(2) Though service sector has been the fastest growing sector in the last dacade and has contributed
more than 50 per cent of the GDP, it provides less than 25 per cent of the total employment.
Services that have witnessed a very high growth rate e.g. business and communication services
have a low share in GDP or employment.
(3) Although economic reforms have been undertaken in all the sectors but they are inadequate.
In financial sector many controls and bottlenecks are still there. These need to be removed
if financial sector of India has to achieve the international standard.
(4) India has great potential in the tourism sector. But there is a need to create proper set up
for attracting tourists. Foreign tourists often get harassed and cheated in the hands of
babus and officialdom, touts and conmen.
(5) Etiquettes and good behaviour are the hallmark of the service sector. Indian service providers
whether they are in banks, in hotels and restaurants, in hospitals or in public administration,
they need to be trained thoroughly in public dealing, etiquettes, hospitality and manners.
(6) The airports, railways etc. in India are not clean and well organized. They need to be
revamped and reorganized.
(7) Our consular division also is not proper. It takes many days to issue visas. This hampers
the growth of tourism sector. For this, we need to have a system which entails single-
window clearance.
(8) Service trade also faces a number of problems. These include lack of set up like export
promotion councils (other than for computer software), various visible and invisible barriers
to service trade for example, visa restrictions, sector specific restrictions and preferential
market access.
(9) Unfair competition in the telecom sector and lack of, internet infrastructure, personal
computer penetration, monitoring and customer demand, mar the growth of e-commerce.
(10) Service sector cannot grow in isolation. It needs strong backing of other sectors, primary
and secondary. In India, such backing needs to be strengthened. In other words, other
sectors especially industries need to grow up if they have to provide market to the service
sector.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 237
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
(11) Indian service providers (like BPOs and IT service providers) are facing stiff competition
from other countries. They need to improve their quality and reduce their costs. There are
certain political problems also like a backlash from European and North Americans
countries especially in the case of BPOs.
SUMMARY
For growth of an economy it is important that its producing sectors - agriculture, industry and
services - grow hand-in-hand. In India, agriculture sector dominates, in the sense it still provides
occupation to nearly 52 per cent of the population. Since agriculture has a pivotal role in the
Indian economy, it has been given importance throughout the planning period. A clear-cut
strategy consisting of land reforms, technological measures, administrative reforms etc. has
been carried out. But unfortunately, agricultural production and productivity have increased
just up to the point of imparting self-sufficiency in food grains and that too at a very low level
of consumption.
The industrial sector of an economy contributes to its economic development by acting as a
catalyst in the development of other sectors like agricultural, tertiary and export sectors. It
helps in raising the per capita output in the economy due to its high income elasticity and high
productivity. However, the development of industrial sector is dependent upon the development
of other sectors of the economy. The industrial sector has grown at an average rate of 6.2
percent per annum since Independence. Inspite of a number of problems like under-utilisation
of capacity, high capital-output ratio, high cost, inadequate employment generation, regional
imbalances etc., India has got a well developed industrial structure based on highly developed
infrastructure, a number of sophisticated heavy and capital goods units, a large number of
small units, besides a number of large business houses. Of the many problems faced by
industries, the problem of sickness is very prominent and chronic.
The service sector has emerges as an important sector of the Indian economy. It now contributes
more than 54 per cent of India's GDP and 45 per cent of India's exports. Of its various
components, trade, transport and communication services and financial services are growing
at a rapid pace. This sector faces a number of problems in the form of infrastructure, poor
quality, lack of adequate institutional set-up, lack of trained and hospitable service providers,
and stiff competition from other countries. These problems need to be addressed to if services
sector has to grow more rapidly in future.
238 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
CCCCCHHHHHAAAAAPPPPPTTTTTEEEEERRRRR ––––– 55555
INDIAN
ECONOMY –
A PROFILE
Unit 3
National
Income
in India
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Learning Objectives
At the end of this unit, you will be able to :
(cid:2) know the meaning of National income.
(cid:2) understand the various concepts related to National income.
(cid:2) understand how National income can be approached from three different ways.
(cid:2) know how National income and per capita income are growing in India.
INTRODUCTION
National income is the money value of all the final goods and services produced by a country
during a period of one year. National income consists of a collection of different types of goods
and services of different types. Since these goods are measured in different physical units it is
not possible to add them together. Thus we cannot state national income is so many millions of
metres of cloth, so many million litres of milk, etc. Therefore, there is no way except to reduce
them to a common measure. This common measure is money. The value of all goods and
services produced is measured in money. For example, if the value of a metre of cloth is Rs. 20
and the total cloth produced is 100 metres, then the money value of cloth is Rs. 2000. In this
way we can find out the value of other goods and services and the total value of all the goods
and services produced during one year. This gives us a single measure of the final goods and
services produced by the country in that year which is nothing but the value of national income
or national product.
3.0 BASIC CONCEPTS IN NATIONAL INCOME AND OUTPUT
(1) Gross Domestic Product (GDP) : Gross domestic product is the money value of all final
goods and services produced in the domestic territory of a country during an accounting
year. The concept of domestic territory has a special meaning in national income accounting.
Domestic territory is defined to include the following:
(i) Territory lying within the political frontiers, including territorial waters of the country.
(ii) Ships and aircrafts operated by the residents of the country between two or more countries.
(iii) Fishing vessels, oil and natural gas rigs, and floating platforms operated by the
residents of the country in the international waters or engaged in extraction in areas
in which the country has exclusive rights of exploitation.
(iv) Embassies, consulates and military establishments of the country located abroad.
(2) GDP at Constant Prices and at Current Prices : GDP can be estimated at current prices
and at constant prices. If the domestic product is estimated on the basis of the prevailing
prices it is called gross domestic product at current prices. Thus when we say that GDP of
India at current prices in 2007-08 is Rs. 43,20,892 crores, we are measuring GDP on the
basis of the prices prevailing in 2003-04. On the other hand, if GDP is measured on the
240 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
basis of some fixed prices, that is prices prevailing at a point of time or in some base year
it is known as GDP at constant prices or real gross domestic product. Thus when we say
that GDP in 2007-08 is Rs. 31,29,717 crores at 1999-00 prices, we are measuring GDP on
the basis of the prices prevailing in 1999-2000.
(3) GDP at Factor Cost and GDP at Market Price : The contribution of each producing unit to
the current flow of goods and services is known as the net value added. GDP at factor cost
is estimated as the sum of net value added by the different producing units and the
consumption of fixed capital. Since the net value added gets distributed as income to the
owners of factors of production, we can also estimate GDP as the sum of domestic factor
incomes and consumption of fixed capital. Conceptually, the value of GDP whether estimated
at market price or factor cost must be identical. This is because the final value of goods and
services (i.e. market price) must be equal to the cost involved in their production (factor
cost). However, the market value of goods and services is not the same as the earnings of the
factors of production. GDP at market price includes indirect taxes and excludes the subsidies
given by the government. Therefore, in order to arrive at GDP at factor income we must
subtract indirect taxes from and add subsidies to GDP at market price.
In brief GDP = GDP - IT + S.
F.C M.P.
Where IT = Indirect Taxes
S = Subsidies
(4) Net Domestic Product : While calculating GDP no provision is made for depreciation
allowance (also called capital consumption allowance). In such a situation gross domestic
product will not reveal complete flow of goods and services through various sectors.
It is a matter of common knowledge that capital goods like machines, equipment, tools,
buildings, tractors etc., get depreciated during the process of production. After some time
these capital goods need replacement. A part of capital is therefore, set aside in the form
of depreciation allowance. When depreciation allowance is subtracted from gross domestic
product we get net domestic product.
In brief
NDP = GDP - depreciation
(5) Gross National Product (GNP) : It has already been seen that whatever is produced within
the domestic territory of a country in a year is its gross domestic product. It, however,
includes, the contribution made by non-resident producers by way of wages, rent, interest
and profits. The non-residents work in the domestic territory of some other country and
earn factor incomes. For example, Indian residents go abroad to work. Indian banks are
functioning abroad. Indians own property in foreign countries. The income of all these
people is the factor income earned from abroad. In other words, it is factor income earned
from abroad by the residents of India by rendering factor services abroad. Similarly, factor
services are rendered by non- residents within the domestic territory of India. Net factor
income from abroad is the difference between the income received from abroad for rendering
factor services and the income paid for the factor services rendered by non-residents in
the domestic territory of a country.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 241
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Gross national product is defined as the sum of the gross domestic product and net factor
incomes from abroad. Thus in order to estimate the gross national product of India we
have to add net factor income from abroad i.e., income earned by Indian residents abroad
minus income earned by non-residents in India to form the gross domestic product of
India.
In brief GNP = GDP + NFIA (where NFIA is the net factor income from abroad).
(6) Net National Product (NNP) : It can be derived by subtracting depreciation allowance
from GNP. It can also be found out by adding the net factor income from abroad to the net
domestic product. If the net factor income from abroad is positive i.e., the inflow of factor
income from abroad is more than the outflow, NNP will be more than NDP; conversely, if
net factor income from abroad is negative, NNP will be less than NDP and it would be
equal to NDP in case the net factor income from abroad is zero. Symbolically,
NNP = NDP + NFIA
(7) NNP at factor cost or National Income : NNP at factor cost is the volume of commodities
and services turned out during an accounting year, counted without duplication. It can
also be defined as the net value added at factor cost (by the residents) in an economy
during an accounting year. In terms of income earned by the factors of production, NNP
at factor cost or national income is defined as the sum of domestic factor incomes and net
factor income from abroad. If NNP figure is available at market prices we will subtract
indirect taxes and add subsidies to the figure to get NNP at factor cost or national income
of the economy.
Symbolically, NNP at FC = National Income = FID + NFIA
where FID is factor income earned in the domestic territory of a country and NFIA is the
net factor income from abroad.
There are two more concepts: Personal Income and Personal Disposal Income. Personal
income is the sum of all incomes actually received by individuals during a given year. In
order to estimate it we subtract from national income the sum total of social security
contribution and corporate income taxes and undistributed corporate profits and add
personal payments which are incomes received but not currently earned.
After the deduction of personal taxes from personal income of the individuals what is left
is called personal disposable income which is equal to consumption plus saving.
The following statements mathematically summarise the various concepts discussed above
and the relationship among them:
GNP at market price - depreciation = NNP at market price.
GNP at market price - net income from abroad = GDP at market price.
GNP at market price - net indirect taxes = GNP at factor cost.
NNP at market price - net income from abroad = NDP at market price.
NNP at market price - net indirect taxes = NNP at factor cost.
GDP at market price - net indirect taxes = GDP at factor cost.
242 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
GNP at factor cost - depreciation = NNP at factor cost.
NDP at market price - net indirect taxes = NDP at factor cost.
GDP at factor cost - depreciation = NDP at factor cost.
3.1 METHODS OF MEASURING NATIONAL INCOME
Production and sale of goods and services and the generation of income which accompanies
these activities are processes that go on continuously. Production gives rise to income; income
gives rise to demand for goods and services; and demand in turn gives rises to expenditure;
again expenditure leads to further production. The circular flow of production, income and
expenditure represents three related phases, namely, production, distribution and disposition.
These three phases enable us to look at national income in three ways - as a flow of goods and
services, as a flow of incomes or as a flow of expenditure on goods and services. To measure it
at each phase, we require different data and methods. If we want to measure it at the phase of
production, we have to find out the sum of net values added by all the producing enterprises
of the country. If we want to measure it at the phase of income distributed, we have to find out
the total income generated in the production of goods and services. Finally, if we want to
measure it at the phase of disposition, we have to know the sum of expenditures of the three
spending units in the economy, namely, government, consumer households, and producing
enterprises.
Corresponding to the three phases, there are three methods of measuring national income.
They are:
(i) Value Added Method (alternatively known as Product Method);
(ii) Income Method; and
(iii) Expenditure Method.
(i) Value Added Method: Value added method measures the contribution of each producing
enterprise in the domestic territory of the country. This method involves the following
steps:
(a) Identifying the producing enterprise and classifying them into industrial sectors
according to their activities.
(b) Estimating net value added by each producing enterprise as well as each industrial
sector and adding up the net value added by all the sectors.
All the producing enterprises are broadly classified into three main sectors namely: (1) Primary
sector which includes agriculture and allied activities; (2) Secondary sector which includes
manufacturing units and (3) Tertiary sector which include services like banking, insurance,
transport and communications, trade and professions. These sectors are further divided into
sub-sectors and each sub-sector is further divided into commodity group or service-group.
For calculating the net product of the industrial sector we need to know about gross output of
the sector, the raw materials and intermediate goods and services used by the sector and the
amount of depreciation. For an individual unit, we subtract from the value of its gross output,
the value of the raw material and intermediate goods and services used by it and, from this, we
GENERAL ECONOMICS 243
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
subtract the amount of depreciation to get net product or value added by each unit. Adding
value-added by all the units in one sub-sector, we get value-added by the sub-sector. Again
adding value-added or net products of all the sub-sectors of a sector we get value-added or net
product of that sector. For the economy as a whole, we add net products contributed by each
sector to get Net Domestic Product. If the information regarding the final output and intermediate
goods is available in terms of market prices we can easily convert it in terms of factor costs by
subtracting (or adding as the case may be) net indirect taxes to it. If we add or subtract net
income from abroad we get Net National Product at factor cost which is nothing but National
Income.
Care should be taken to include the value of the following items :
(a) Own account production of fixed assets by government, enterprises and households.
(b) Production for self-consumption.
(c) Imputed rent of owner occupied houses.
Care should also be taken not to include sale of second-hand machines because they were
counted as a part of production in the year in which they were produced. However, brokerage
and commission earned by the dealers of second-hand goods are a part of production and
hence included while calculating total value-added. There is a difference of opinion among the
national income accountants regarding raw materials, intermediate goods and depreciation.
For example, a question arises whether government services are final (because they add to
satisfaction) or intermediate (because they are essential for economic activity). In India, we
treat them as final services but in Soviet Union (now called Commonwealth of Independent
States) these are treated as intermediate services. Similarly, it is very difficult to ascertain the
actual amount of depreciation because a fall in the value of capital stock depends upon many
factors which are difficult to measure.
Moreover, large areas of production activities are excluded for varying reasons. Their net
products cannot be valued either because there is no acceptable way of valuing them (which is
true in the case of services of housewives or self-services in homes or services of friends) or
because of the difficulty of securing data of the subsistence producing units particularly in
underdeveloped countries.
The product method thus gives information about the industrial origins of national income.
Additionally, net income from abroad should also be included or subtracted to get a true picture
of national income.
(ii) Income Method : Different factors of production pool their services for carrying out
production activities. These factors of production, in return, are paid for their services in
the form of factor incomes. Thus labour gets wages, land gets rent, capital gets interest
and entrepreneur gets profits. In other words, whatever is produced by a producing unit
is distributed among the factors of production for their services and aggregate of factor
incomes of all the factors of production of all the producing units form the subject matter
of calculation of national income by income method.
Only incomes earned by owners of primary factors of production are included in national
income. Transfer incomes are excluded from national income. Thus, while wages of labourers
244 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
will be included, pensions of retired workers will be excluded from national income. Labour
income includes, apart from wages and salaries, bonus, commission, employers' contribution
to provident fund and compensations in kind. Non-labour income includes dividends,
undistributed profits of corporations before taxes, interest, rent, royalties and profits of
unincorporated enterprises and of government enterprises.
However, normally, it is difficult to separate labour income from capital income because in
many instances people provide both labour and capital services. Such is the case with self-
employed people like lawyers, engineers, traders, proprietors etc. In economies where subsistence
production and small commodity production is dominant most of the incomes of people would
be of mixed type. In sectors such as agriculture, trade, transport etc. in underdeveloped countries
(including India), it is difficult to differentiate between labour element and capital element of
incomes of the people. In order to overcome this difficulty a new category of incomes, called
mixed income is introduced which includes all those incomes which are difficult to separate.
Care has to be taken to see that transfer incomes do not get included in national income. In this
context it is worthwhile to note that personal income which is income of household sector
should not be confused with national income. While personal income includes transfer
payments, national income does not. Similarly, illegal incomes, windfall gains, death duties,
gift tax and sale proceeds of second-hand goods are not included while calculating national
income.
Net income from abroad need not be added separately since the incomes received by people
include net foreign incomes as well. But if national income is calculated not from incomes
received by the people but from data regarding incomes paid out by producers then net income
from abroad would have to be added separately because incomes paid by producers would
total to domestic income. To arrive at national income, net income from abroad should be
added to domestic income.
(iii) Expenditure Method: The various sectors - household sector, business sector and
government sector either spend their incomes on consumer goods and services or save a part
of their incomes or we can say that they spend a part of their incomes on non-consumption
goods (or capital goods).
Total expenditure in an economy consists of expenditure on financial assets, on goods produced
in preceding periods, on raw materials and intermediate goods and services and on final goods
and services produced in the current period.
Expenditure on financial assets which are produced and owned within the country is excluded
but expenditure on financial assets of foreign countries is included in national expenditure.
However, only the net expenditure i.e., the difference between expenditure on foreign financial
assets by residents and expenditure on the country's financial assets by non-residents or
foreigners is incorporated. This difference is also called net foreign investment. Goods produced
in preceding years are also excluded from national income because they have been accounted
for in the national incomes of the periods when they were produced. Similarly, expenditure on
raw materials and intermediate goods and services are excluded because otherwise there would
be double counting of some of the items included in the national income. Government
expenditure on pensions, scholarships, unemployment allowance etc. should be excluded
because these are transfer payments.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 245
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Thus, only expenditure on final goods and services produced in the period for which national
income is to be measured and net foreign investment are included in the expenditure method
of calculating national income.
Expenditure on final goods and services is broadly classified into expenditure on consumer
goods and service (also called consumption expenditure) and expenditure on capital goods
(also called investment expenditure). Consumption expenditure is classified into private
consumption expenditure of the household sector and government consumption expenditure;
and investment expenditure is classified into private investment expenditure by business sector
and investment expenditure by government. To the total domestic investment we add net
foreign investment in order to arrive at national investment. Thus, the aggregates resulting
from the expenditure method measured at market prices are as follows:
Gross national expenditure = Consumption expenditure + net domestic investment + net foreign
investment + replacement expenditure (i.e., expenditure on replacement investment).
Net national expenditure = Consumption expenditure + net domestic investment + net foreign
investment.
Net domestic expenditure = Consumption expenditure + net domestic investment.
All the three methods mentioned above should ideally lead to the same figure of national
income and therefore national income of a country should be measured by these methods
separately to get a three dimensional view of the economy. This helps the government to analyse
the level of production and economic welfare in the economy, to analyse stability and growth
of the economy and to formulate appropriate economic policies of the government. Moreover,
each method provides a check on the accuracy of the other methods. However, it is easier said
than done. Because of lack of proper and reliable data it is very difficult to estimate national
income by each method separately. This is especially so in underdeveloped economies.
As a matter of fact, countries like India are unable to estimate their national income wholly by
one method. The contributions of different sectors to the total national income are estimated
by different methods. Thus, in agricultural sector net value added is estimated by the production
method, in small scale sector net value added is estimated by the income method and in
construction sector net value added is estimated by the expenditure method.
Income method may be most suitable for developed economies where people properly file their
income tax returns. With the growing facility in the use of the commodity flow method of
estimating expenditures, an increasing proportion of the national income is being estimated by
the expenditure method.
Estimation of the national income of a country is not an easy task. Appropriate and completely
reliable data for accomplishing this work is not available even in developed countries. The
following problems require particular mention:
(1) Presence of a large non-monetized sector
(2) Lack of appropriate and reliable data
(3) Problem of double counting
(4) Problem of transfer payments
246 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(5) Difficulties in classification of working population
(6) Unreported illegal income
3.2 TRENDS IN INDIA'S NATIONAL INCOME GROWTH AND
STRUCTURE
For finding out the impact of economic planning in India a study of trends in national income
is necessary. It would be better, therefore, if the trend in national income and changes in the
structure of national product are analysed over the five and a half decades of planning.
(i) Trends in NNP : The real national income of India has increased at an annual average rate
of 4.4 per cent during the 58 years of economic planning.
There are two distinctive phases of economic growth in India since Independence: 1950-
1980 and 1980-2004. During the period 1950-51 to 1979-80, growth in GDP was 3.5 per
cent and during 1980-81 to 2003-04, growth in GDP was 5.6 per cent per annum. If we
consider the period between 2004-05 and 2007-08, GDP growth rate substantially increased
to 8.9 per cent per annum.
Colonial past, restrictive trade policy, licensing system, inward looking foreign policies,
too much stress on public sector and socialistic society, anti-market and anti-competition
attitude of the State, and vagaries of nature are some of the reasons for very poor
performance of the economy during 1950-80. In fact, since India continued to have an
average growth rate of 3.5 per cent, this rate i.e. 3.5 per cent came to be recognized as
Hindu rate of growth.
Acceleration in economic growth since 1980 was attributable to several factors.
Expansionary macro economic policies, economic reforms including trade liberalization
and deregulation of industries especially since 1991, reasonably well established social
and legal framework, well developed higher education system, improvement in
infrastructural facilities, change in attitude of national leadership, adoption of pro-market
policies, well fostered entrepreneurial skills and improvement in science and technology
etc. all led to improving the rate of growth of Indian economy.
Restructuring measures by domestic industry, overall reduction in domestic interest rates,
improved profitability, a benign investment climate amidst strong global demand and
commitment based fiscal policy have led to real GDP growth averaging 9 per cent per
annum during 2004-08.
Economic growth decelerated in 2008-09 to 6.7 per cent. The global financial crisis and
consequent economic recession in developed economies have been major factors in India’s
economic slow down. The deceleration of growth in 2008-09 was spread across almost all
the sectors.
How a country is performing can be judged in a two ways- by comparing its performance
with other countries and by comparing its performance with the targets set by it.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 247
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
IINNDDIIAANN EECCOONNOOMMYY –– AA PPRROOFFIILLEE
A comparison with a few of the developing countries is shown in the following Table:
Table 8: Real GDP Growth –Select Countries (per cent)
Country 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000-06
Brazil 5.9 8.5 3.0 1.7 3.1
China 3.0 7.4 9.8 10.0 9.5
India 4.0 2.9 5.6 5.7 7.0
Korea 8.3 8.3 7.7 6.3 5.2
Thailand 7.8 7.5 7.3 5.3 5.0
As can be seen in the Table, India’s rate of growth is improving. In fact, India now ranks
among the top ten fastest growing countries in the world along with China, Vietnam,
South Korea, Malaysia Thailand, Singapore, among others.
Plan-wise study of growth of real income in India, also indicates an encouraging fact that
although the annual rate of increase in national income was pretty low during the first
three decades of planning, it has lately risen and stood at 5.6 per cent per annum during
the eighties, around 5.7 per cent per annum during the nineties and 7 per cent during
2000-06.
During the First Plan, annual average growth rate was 3.7 per cent (at 1970-71 prices),
which increased to 4.2 per cent during the Second Plan. However, during the Third Plan,
annual average increase in national income slumped down to 2.8 per cent. This was largely
the consequence of serious drought in 1965-67, and thus the growth rate got depressed.
The depression continued in 1967-68. Only after 1967-68, the situation improved. During
the Fourth Plan, the average annual rate of growth of national income was 3.9 per cent.
The sharp upsurge in prices during 1972-73 and 1973-74 and the short falls in the
production on account of lower utilisation of capacity were the main factors responsible
for a lower growth rate during this plan. The Fifth Plan witnessed an annual economic
growth rate of 5 per cent. On the whole, the performance during the Fifth Plan was
satisfactory. During 1978-79 and 1979-80, the economy suffered a set back and the national
income fell by around 5.3 per cent. India's national income increased at a rate of 5.5 per cent
during the Sixth plan. Again, the seventh plan period witnessed 3 years of good harvest
which resulted in 5.8 per cent annual growth rate.
During the Eighth Plan, India achieved the highest ever annual average growth rate of
6.8 per cent. The spurt in economic reforms and good harvest for almost entire plan could
be mainly responsible for such a good performance of the economy. During the Ninth
plan, the annual average growth rate dipped to 5.4 per cent. This lower rate of growth
against the target of 6.5 per cent has been due to the dismal performance of the Industry.
During the five years of the Tenth Plan (2002-07), the economy registered growth rates of
3.8, 9.0, 7.8, 9 and 9.2 per cent respectively. Against the annual average target growth
rate of 8 per cent in the Tenth Plan (2002-07), achieved rate is 7.6 per cent per annum.
Encouraged with the good performance in the Tenth Plan, the Approach paper to Eleventh Plan
keeps a target of 8.5 per cent per annum growth rate.
224488 CCOOMMMMOONN PPRROOFFIICCIIEENNCCYY TTEESSTT
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(ii) Trends in Per Capita Income : India's per capita net national product i.e., during the last
58 years of planning has increased at a rate of 2.3 per cent per annum. This is modest
performance by all means. The rate of increase in per capita net national product was not
only conspicuously low but despite 58 years of economic planning, was still unsteady and
erratic. The per capita income increased at a modest rate of about 1.8 and 2.0 per cent
during First and Second Plans respectively.
As the Third Plan witnessed severe droughts, per capita income grew at almost zero per cent.
During the Fourth Plan, the situation improved a little bit and the per capita income grew
at a rate of 1.5 per cent per annum. The performance of the economy was satisfactory
during the Fifth Plan and the per capita income increase at a rate of 2.7 per cent per
annum. However, during 1978-79 and 1979-80, the economy suffered a set back and per
capita income fell by around 8.3 per cent during 1979-80 alone. The economy once again
witnessed years of good harvests during the sixth and seventh plans and the per capita
income recorded a growth of 3.2 and 3.6 per cent per annum respectively during these
plans. In the Eighth and Ninth plans, the per capita income witnessed a growth rate of 4.5
and 3.3 per cent per annum respectively. In the Tenth Plan, per capita income growth
accelerated to 6.1 per cent per annum.
It is to be noted that during 1950-51 to 1979-80, growth in GDP per capita per annum
was 1.4 per cent per annum. It accelerated to 3.6 per cent per annum during 1980-81 to
2004-05.
SUMMARY
We have seen that national income is nothing but money value of all the final goods and
services produced by the residents of an economy during a period of time, say one year. National
income can be measured by any of the three methods, namely product method, expenditure
method and income method. Theoretically we will get identical answers. We have also learned
various concepts in national income estimation like GNP at factor price, GNP at market price,
GDP, NNP and so on. In actual practice, there are various difficulties (conceptual and statistical)
involved in estimating national income. In India, national income is estimated by using a
combination of product and income method. India's National income has grown at an annual
average rate of around 4.4 per cent per annum since Independence. This rate is low not only
compared with other growing economies but also with regards to targets laid down. Of course,
however, there have been improvements in the growth rate of National income and per capita
income.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 249
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
CCCCCHHHHHAAAAAPPPPPTTTTTEEEEERRRRR ––––– 55555
INDIAN
ECONOMY –
A PROFILE
Unit 4
Basic
Understanding of
Tax System
in India
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Learning Objectives
At the end of this unit, you will be able to :
(cid:2) know the meaning of Direct and Indirect Taxes.
(cid:2) know about merits and demerits of Direct and Indirect Taxes.
(cid:2) know about the taxation system prevailing in India.
4.0 MEANING OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES
Tax is the most important source of revenue of the Government. A tax is a compulsory
contribution from a person to the expenses incurred by the State in common interest of all
without reference to specific benefits conferred on any individual. Taxes are generally classified
into direct taxes and indirect taxes. Taxes which are not shifted i.e., the incidence of which
falls on persons who pay them to the Government are direct taxes. Examples of direct taxes are
income tax and wealth tax. Where the burden is shifted through a change in price, the taxes
are indirect. Examples of indirect taxes are sales tax, custom duty, excise duty etc.
4.1 MERITS AND DEMERITS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES
Merits of Direct Taxes :
(i) They are imposed according to the ability of the person to pay. Therefore these taxes are
considered progressive.
(ii) The revenue is income elastic; because of the progressive character revenue will increase
faster than the increase in income.
(iii) These taxes create better civic consciousness because the person paying knows clearly
how much he has paid. This incidentally fulfils the objective of certainty.
(iv) They best serve the purpose of transference of income from the rich to the poor, through
provision of amenities to the poor or even direct monetary help like old age pensions.
Demerits of Direct Taxes
(i) The ability to pay is difficult to determine; only a rough idea can be formed.
(ii) Because of undeclared sources of income or evasion, the actual payment may not be strictly
according to the ability to pay. It is also sometimes said that direct taxes are taxes on the
honesty of the person.
(iii) Such taxes necessitate proper maintenance of accounts which some of the tax payers may
not be able to do.
(iv) The assessment procedure is also cumbersome requiring expert assistance of tax advisers.
The direct tax system is often very complicated.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 251
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Merits of Indirect Taxes
(i) The most important merit is convenience in assessment and a relative difficulty in evasion.
This is because they are assessed at flat rates and realised at appropriate point such as at
the factory site in the case of an excise duty on production or at point of entry in the case
of imports.
(ii) Since the tax is included in the price, the consumer may not even realise that he is paying
a tax. The amount of tax on each item is often so small as really not to hurt the tax payer.
(iii) Even these taxes may not be really regressive if they are levied on ad valorem basis or on
the basis of value. The rates may also be differential-higher for luxury articles and lower
for necessaries; the latter are sometimes fully exempt.
(iv) Such taxes are difficult to evade. Unless the producers resort to manipulation of accounts
or smuggling, it is difficult to evade the excise duty. In case of customs duties, articles are
taxed the moment they enter the country. However, it is difficult to make a similar claim
in respect of sales tax.
(v) Indirect taxes on drinks, narcotics and tobacco, serve a social purpose by discouraging
their consumption.
Demerits of Indirect Taxes:
(i) These taxes are often criticised for their regressive character. Taxes on necessaries of life
will certainly mean taxing the poor and that will mean taxing the rich and the poor alike.
(ii) Also it is contended that these taxes do not create social consciousness because they are
often not felt by tax payers.
(iii) Government is not certain about the proceeds of these taxes.
(iv) The burden of indirect taxes can be shifted forward or backward. In most of the cases, the
consumers have to bear the ultimate burden of indirect taxes.
(v) These taxes can also be evaded by such methods as smuggling, falsification of accounts
etc.
4.2 TAX STRUCTURE IN INDIA
4.2.0 Direct Taxes in India : Under this mainly income tax, wealth tax and gift tax are included.
Income Tax : Income tax is a tax on the income of an individual or an entity. Income Tax in
India was introduced in India in 1860 but was discontinued in 1873. It was reintroduced in
1886 and since then it has stayed. Since its reintroduction a number of changes have been
made in its structure, rates, exemptions and other dimensions of this system. Important types
of Income tax are Personal income tax and Corporate income tax. Though the State Governments
have power to levy a tax on agricultural income, in practice this tax has not developed as a
major source of revenue for the State Governments.
Personal income tax is levied on the income of individuals, Hindu Undivided Families,
unregistered firms and other association of people. For taxation purposes incomes from all
sources are added. Certain rebates, deductions, expenditure etc. on account of Life insurance,
252 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
medical insurance, savings in Public Provident Fund and certain notified instruments are
allowed. Whole income is divided into different slabs and it is taxed on the basis of slab into
which it falls.
Like all other countries India has a progressive income tax. That means, as income increases,
the rate of tax also increases. There was a time when the income tax rate , inclusive of surcharge
was as high as 97.75 per cent for the highest income slab. Since 1974-75, it has been brought
down(in stages) to 30 per cent in 1997-98. At present also, the marginal rate of income tax (i.e.,
tax for the highest slab) is 30 per cent. Thus the degree of the progressivity of the income tax
schedule has been considerably reduced.
Corporate Tax is levied on the incomes of registered companies and corporations. The rationale
for the corporation tax is that a joint stock company has a separate entity and thus should be
taxed separately.Untill 1960-61, corporations were taxed in a partial sense. A corporation was
required to pay income tax on behalf of its shareholders on dividends paid to them, and each
shareholder got a credit to this effect. Since 1960-61, corporations are being treated as
independent entities and shareholders are not given any credit. Though the corporates are
being taxed at a flat rate, there are provisions for various kinds of rebates and exemptions. Tax
rates are different for Indian companies and foreign companies. Certain types of companies
(e.g. export houses) are given tax exemptions and tax holidays.
Taxes on Wealth and Capital : Taxes which are levied on wealth and capital are mainly estate
duty, annual tax on wealth and gift tax. Estate duty was first introduced in India in 1953. It
was levied on the total property passing to the heirs on the death of a person. From the point
of view of proceeds, the estate duty was a minor source of revenue and it was abolished in
1985. An annual tax on wealth was introduced in 1957. It was levied on the wealth such as
land, bonds, shares etc. of the people. Certain types of properties such as agricultural land and
funds in Provident Account were exempt. Like estate duty this is also a minor source of revenue.
With effect from 1.4.1993, wealth tax has been abolished on all assets except certain specified
assets such as residential houses, farm houses, urban land, jewellery, bullion, motor car etc.
A gift tax was first introduced in 1958 and was leviable on all donations to recognised charitable
institutions, gifts to women dependents and gifts to wife. Gift tax was abolished in 1998.
Gift tax was partially reintroduced in April 2005. Gifts received from any person or persons, if
the aggregate value exceeds Rs.50000, have been made taxable under the head “Income from
other sources”. Certain exemptions have, however, been given. Now (with effect from 1.10.09)
even movable and immovable property given as gift would attract tax if its value exceeds
Rs 50000.
4.2.1 Indirect Taxes: The main indirect taxes levied in India are custom duties, excise duties,
sales tax and service tax.
Custom Duties: Custom duties are levied on exports and imports. From the point of view of
revenue, the importance of export duty is limited. Import duties are generally levied on the
basis of ad valorem which means they are determined as a percentage of the price of the
commodity. On some commodities, specific import duties i.e, per unit taxes on imports are
levied. In pre-tax reform period, India had become a country with one of the highest levels of
custom tariffs in the world. As a part of rationalisation measures carried out since 1991, the
custom duty structure has been pruned.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 253
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
In the first half of 2008-09 fiscal, prices of certain commodities like crude oil, steel and food etc.
shot up world wide. This affected their domestic prices and demand. Consequently, as an
anti-inflationary measure, custom duties on many commodities were reduced.
Subsequently, in the aftermath of the impact of global financial meltdown since September
2008, there was a sharp decline in international commodity prices and some of the duty cuts
were, therefore, reversed.
But since the growth momentum of the economy was slowing down in the second half of the
2008-09, fiscal stimuli in the form of certain custom duties cut and exceptions were also given.
Excise Duties : An excise duty is levied on production and has absolutely no connection with
its actual sale. Excise duties are levied by the central Government in a number of forms. Over
the years, number of rate categories has been reduced and number of exemptions notifications
have also been brought down.
Taxation on inputs, such as raw materials, components and other intermediaries has a number
of limitations. It very often distorts the production structure, results in cascading of taxes (i.e.
compounding of tax liability) and does not allow correct assessment of the tax incidence. In
order to remove these defects, the government introduced Modified Value Added Tax
(MODVAT) in 1986-87. Value added is the difference between a firm's revenues and its
payments to other firms. It is the value difference between sales and purchased items.
MODVAT was different from VAT. VAT covers the entire value of inputs where as under
MODVAT credit was given in respect of duty paid inputs only. Under MODVAT a
manufacturer got full reimbursement of excise duty paid on the raw materials or components.
This system prevented payments of duties on earlier duties paid. However, MODVAT suffered
from many shortcomings. The most important being, the existence of a number of rates on
output and inputs leading to disputes relating to classification of both the output and inputs.
In order to combat the problem, the Budget 2000-01 introduced the Central Value-Added Tax
[CENVAT]. To attract CENVAT, there must be a process amounting to manufacture/
production and outcome should be excisable goods. The goods should be made in India to
attract CENVAT. It consists only one basic excise duty of 8 per cent and some special excise
duties. The basic rate of 8 percent is applicable to all the excisable commodities. Special excise
duty is in addition to CENVAT. It is leviable on a few mentioned goods. The basic excise paid
on excisable goods can be deducted from the excise collected on the output so that only tax on
value added is paid.
The CENVAT is simple. It will result in transparency in the system of union excise duty. The
earlier system of physically checking of goods can now be replaced by an account based systems.
Besides, it reduces cascading effect of input taxation. But the system suffers from certain
shortcomings such as existence of some cumbersome procedures, inadequate coverage of
CENVAT, scope of tax-evasion and so on.
Sales Tax : Sales tax is a tax on business transactions and thus it differs from excise duty in
certain respects. In India, many commodities are not covered by sales tax. Sales tax is more in
the case of luxury items and less or almost nil in the case of necessities. Under sales tax, the
registered trading concerns are required to pay the sales tax to the government. These registered
254 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
concerns shift the burden of sales tax to the customers. Sales tax regime suffers from many
problems, main being, cascading effect,lack of transparency, narrow base, different procedures
followed by different states and so on.
In India, sales tax was in two forms – state sales tax and central sales tax. State sale tax (i.e. tax
on transactions within a state) is being replaced by Value Added Tax in all states. Central sales
tax is inter-state sales tax. This tax is non-rebatable tax and is incongruent with the system of
VAT. Therefore, it is being phased out in stages. At present it is 2 per cent. By the financial year
2010-11, it will be completely phased out.
VAT : Value Added Tax (VAT) is a multistage sales tax with credit for taxes paid on business
purchases. One of the major benefits of VAT over sales tax is that the former is non-cascading.
One of the important components of tax reforms initiated since liberalization relate to
introducing state-level value added tax (VAT). The VAT is a multi-point destination based
system of taxation, with tax being levied on value addition at each stage of transaction in the
production/distributional chain. If for example, inputs worth Rs. 1,00,000/- are purchased
and sales are worth Rs. 2,00,000/- in a month, and input tax rate and output tax rate are 4%
and 10% respectively, then input tax credit and calculation of VAT will be as shown below:
(a) Input purchased : Rs. 1,00,000.
(b) Output sold : Rs. 2,00,000.
(c) Input tax paid : Rs. 4,000.
(d) Output tax payable : Rs. 20,000.
(e) VAT payable after
set-off input tax credit : Rs. 16,000.
[(d) - (c)]
The following are the benefits of VAT:
(cid:2) A set off will be given for input tax as well as tax paid on previous purchases.
(cid:2) Other taxes such as turnover tax, surcharge etc. will be abolished.
(cid:2) Overall tax burden will be rationalised.
(cid:2) Price will in general fall.
(cid:2) There will be higher revenue growth.
(cid:2) The zero rating of exports would increase the competitiveness of Indian exports.
(cid:2) There is a provision of self-assessment.
(cid:2) There will be more transparency.
VAT was introduced in 1999 and was implemented in April, 2005 in some states.
At present 33 states/union territories have implemented VAT. The tax revenue of the VAT
implementing states/union territories has registered a growth of more than 20 per cent per
annum since 2006-07.
GENERAL ECONOMICS 255
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
INDIAN ECONOMY – A PROFILE
Service Tax : Service tax is a form of indirect tax imposed on specified services called taxable services.
Introduced in the year 1994-95, service tax network has expanded to cover more than 100 services
over the years.
The rate of service tax was revised from 5 per cent in 2002-03 to 12 per cent in 2008-09.
However, with effect from 24.02.09 it has been reduced to 10 per cent.
4.2.2 Features of Tax Structure in India : Following are the main features of tax structure of
India :-
(i) Tax revenues (on account of the centre, state and union territories) form about 20 per cent
(2008-09) of the total national income of India. This was only 6.7 per cent in 1950-51 and
11 per cent in 1960-61. Considering the fact that India is a low income economy, the tax
burden is quite high. Among the Third World countries, India is one of the highest taxed
countries.
(ii) Over the last 57 tax revenue collected both by the Central and State governments has
increased many folds from Rs. 460 crore in 1951-52 to more than
Rs. 12,00,000 crore in 2008-09.
(iii) The ratio of direct to indirect taxes which was 40:60 in 1950-51 declined to 20:80 in 1990-
91. Thus there has been an increasing reliance on indirect taxes which is not good since
they fuel inflationary trends in the country. But since 1990-91, in wake of rationalisation,
the proportion of direct taxes has been on rise, whereas that of indirect taxes on the decline.
The share of direct taxes in the gross tax revenue (Centre and States combined) was 40 per
cent in 2008-09 while that of indirect taxes declined to 60%.
(iv) The population of the economy is more than 115 crore. But only 2.5 per cent of the
population is liable to pay income tax in India. Thus Indian tax structure relies on a very
narrow population base.
(v) The total tax revenue is highly insufficient to meet the expenditure requirements of the
economy. Over time there has been an increasing reliance to internal and external debts.
(vi) The structure of taxes in India has under gone changes. Earlier income tax and corporate
tax were important sources of the union revenue. Then excise duties became important.
Similarly, land revenues were important source of state revenue. Then sale tax became
more important. With the onset of nineties, the relative importance of different taxes has
been undergoing changes once again; the importance of personal income tax and corporate
tax has been on the rise, whereas that of customs and excise duty on the decline, although
Union excise duties continue to be the one of the largest source of tax revenue.
(vii) In India, the direct taxes are progressive, indirect taxes are differential in nature. In other
words, direct tax rates increase with increase in income and indirect tax rates are higher
for luxury items and lower for necessities.
(viii)The agriculture income is exempt from the income-tax.
256 COMMON PROFICIENCY TEST
Copyright -The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Showing pages 1–50 of 61Next 50 pages →